Rubric for Hero Presentation
Transcript: Grading the Prezi Presentation 20 pts. -- Well rehearsed with smooth delivery that captivated the audience. Outstanding quality. Excellent audience engagement (making eye contact w/ most of class) w/ few stumbles & an audible voice. 12 pts. -- Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that held the audience's attention most of the time. Very good connection with audience. (You made good eye contact with class members.) 10 pts. -- Delivery was not smooth but it held the interest of the audience most of the time. Average quality. Engagement w/ audience needed improvement. 5 pts. -- Delivery was not smooth and audience's attention was often lost. Poor engagement with audience (making little to no eye contact with class members. Works Cited Rubric - 100 points. 20 pts. -- Made excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc., to enhance the presentation. Typeface colors and sizes were visually pleasing and large enough to read. Used four design principles throughout. 15 pts. -- Made very good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc., to enhance presentation. Typeface choices usually visually pleasing and legible. Used at least three design principles most of the time. 10 pts. -- Made use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc., but occasionally these detracted from the presentation. Followed two design principles w/ inconsistent effects. 5 pts. -- Made use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc., but these often distracted from the presentation. Followed one design principle. Presentation Organization 10 pts. -- All research articles, images, and video sources were listed in proper MLA format. 8 pts. -- Most, but one or two research articles, images, and video sources were listed in MLA format. 5 pts. -- Some research articles, images, and video sources were listed, but others were not. Some sources not in proper MLA format. 0 pts. -- No sources were cited. Works Cited page missing. Content Graphic Design 20 pts. -- Content was well organized according to the required topics. Covers all aspects. 16 pts. -- Content was well organized but not fully responding to the required topics. Covers most aspects. 13 pts. -- Content was organized but some pieces seemed out of place. 8 pts. -- There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just many facts and not much analysis. 30 pts. -- In depth coverage with details and examples. Subject knowledge was excellent. You covered all of the required aspects in excellent and balanced detail. 24 pts. -- Included essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appeared to be very good. You fully covered all but one or two of the topics, which were hinted at, but not fully described. 20 pts. -- Included essential information, but many areas needed detailed information and/or you failed to address several topics. 10 pts. -- Included minimal information and you answered only one or two of the topics. Information was not balanced: too much detail on one or two aspects and not enough on others.