You're about to create your best presentation ever

Governance Structure Powerpoint Template

Create your presentation by reusing a template from our community or transition your PowerPoint deck into a visually compelling Prezi presentation.

Governance Structure

Transcript: The offical languages of Morocco are Arabic and French Islam is the main religion followed Arabic dialect, Derija is most widely spoken The culture is "deeply rooted" in Islam Moroccans traditions value family, honor, dignity, generosity, hospitality, and self-control Post-colonial Language, Culture, and Religion Europeans were attracted to the location and resources of Morocco The industrialization of the Europeans made it easier to invade and rule French and Spain wanted to conquer Morocco They had an agreement to divide Morocco into two zones of French and Spanish influence in 1904 Post-colonial Colonial Bibliography Colonial Colonial Pre-colonial Pre-Colonial Cities were located by the rivers or by the coast for easy access of transportation and trade Morocco was a rich agricultural land Pre-colonial 1956 Morocco became an independent country 2011: a new constitution was created It lessened the power of King Muhammad VI and strengthened the power of the prime minister Spain took control of the far north and south of Morocco France took control of central Morocco Bibliography Fact Monster. Last modified 2008. http://www.factmonster.com/ipka/A0107800.html. Geographia. Last modified 1998. Accessed 2005. http://www.geographia.com/morocco/. Madar, Anuja, ed. Frommer's Morocco. Frommer's. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2010. The Political and Economic History of Morocco. http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/morocco.htm. World Travel Guide. Accessed 2014. http://www.worldtravelguide.net/morocco/history-language-culture. Morocco was in demand for its agricultural land, location, and resources Post-Colonial Morocco Royal Moroccan Forces were founded in 1956 after the independence of Morocco from Spain and France Geography and infrastructure In 1956 Morocco became free from France's rule (left a great influence on culture) Spanish and French were a secondary language Religion: Christianity, jewish, and Islam Governance Structure Colonial Post-Colonial By Jessica Whetzell Pre-Colonial Today Morocco employs 45% of labor force Morocco's industries: Food processing, Leather goods, Textiles, Construction, and Tourism Morocco has the world's third largest deposite of phosphate (20% of export earnings) Issues: high unemployment and illeteracy Morocco is located in northwest of Africa 102,703 Square miles Issues: Soil erosion, over-grazing, destruction of habitat and water supply contaminated by raw sewage 1912: Morocco established an army made up of a Makhzen Army (only the higher ranked people were able to join) and the Berber militias. The Berber militias had the abilities to withstand the French and Spanish for over 30 years. Morocco was under the control of the Berbers since 2nd millennium B.C. Many conflicts between the Berbers and the Arabs Arabs introduced Moroccans to the dynasty ruling power In the 15th century Spain and Portugal were fought off The pressure of imperialism grew for Morocco Colonial Spain and France had interest in Morocco for: Trade Mineral wealth Fertile land Pre- colonial 1912-1956 a great number of Moroccans were enlisted to serve for the Spahi and Tirailleurs of the French army In 685 Arabs invaded Morocco and brought the religion of Islam Arabs brought the ruling dynasty system to Morocco Morocco's Culture had a mix of Berber, Mediterranean, Andalusian, and african traditions The famous prophet Muhammad came from the Alawite Dynasty in 1660 Armed Forces/ Military Economy Post-Colonial

AIUSA: Governance Structure

Transcript: Challenges and Future Directions Understanding Governance Structure of AIUSA Circular Framework Role of Members AIUSA adopts a circular governance structure, emphasizing collaboration among members rather than a traditional hierarchical model. This design allows for a dynamic flow of ideas and input from all levels, reinforcing the organization’s commitment to democracy and inclusivity. Members play a crucial role in shaping AIUSA’s policies and initiatives. Through active participation in various forums and committees, they contribute their perspectives and expertise, ensuring the organization remains responsive to community needs and human rights challenges. Leadership and Decision-Making External Pressures Committee Functions Leadership in AIUSA is characterized by collective decision-making, where leaders function more as facilitators. This inclusive approach encourages contributions from all members, resulting in decisions that reflect diverse viewpoints and a shared vision for human rights advocacy. AIUSA operates through various committees, each addressing specific areas such as policy development, fundraising, and outreach. These committees are integral to functioning effectively, allowing for specialization while fostering collaboration across different groups to achieve common goals. Amnesty International : Governance Structure Internal Challenges Peer Collaboration Collaboration among peers is a hallmark of AIUSA's governance, encouraging members to share insights and resources. This interaction not only strengthens community bonds but also enhances the effectiveness of campaigns and initiatives, ensuring a united front on human rights issues. AIUSA encounters pressures from political, social, and economic environments. Increasing hostility towards human rights advocacy complicates operations, necessitating strategic adaptability to navigate these challenges effectively. AIUSA faces governance challenges, including member engagement and resource allocation. Ensuring transparency and effective communication across its circular structure remains critical for maintaining motivation and efficacy in its mission. Vision for the Future Strategic Opportunities AIUSA envisions a strengthened member-driven governance model that enhances flexibility and responsiveness. By fostering greater inclusivity and innovation, AIUSA aims to amplify its advocacy efforts in support of human rights globally. The evolving landscape presents AIUSA with opportunities for partnerships and collaborative initiatives. Engaging in coalitions can amplify their impact and resources while fostering a unified front in defense of human rights. The Relationship with Amnesty International Global connection International Secre Resource Sharing AIUSA is integrated into a vast global network of Amnesty International entities. This structure fosters a unified approach to human rights advocacy, facilitating real-time collaboration and shared insights across various regions. How do you fit into the international movement? AIUSA benefits from shared resources within the Amnesty International network, optimizing funding, research, and expertise. This collaborative resource model empowers localized initiatives and shared campaigns. Policy Alignment AIUSA aligns its policies with Amnesty International’s core principles, ensuring a consistent human rights stance worldwide. This alignment enhances the effectiveness of campaigns and amplifies advocacy efforts. Campaign Coordination AIUSA collaborates on global campaigns led by Amnesty International. This coordination allows for unified messaging and enables greater impact through localized actions that resonate with specific audiences.

Proposed Governance Structure

Transcript: Participatory Governance Structure Starting Fall 2022 Shared purpose & appointments from ASHC Administrators Staff Senate Makes Recommendations to the President What do we do as a College? How can we best serve our students? President seeks advice from & consults regularly How do we plan, manage, & report out from the governance system? Consultation Group (College leaders including unions) Executive Cabinet (senior leadership) How well do we do what we are doing & how do we improve? How do we resource what we are doing & plan to do? Governance Coordination Group Governance Coordination Group Governance Coordination Group Membership Approx. 4-12 members At least one tri-lead from each council who attends group meetings, submits and speaks to council reports, and reports back to other leads in his or her council As with each of the councils, support staff is assigned to this group Governance Coordination Group Purpose & Responsibilities SAMPLE RESPONSIBILITIES Conducts Spring retreat to choose strategic governance agenda for the next academic year Manages the strategic governance agenda Coordinates overall flow of agenda items within the governance system Tracks, summarizes, and communicates the actions of all councils Coordination of the routing of 10+1 issues Coordinates & provides oversight for the work of councils to remain focused on shared student-centered goals, to optimize efficiency, to avoid redundancies, and to ensure clear communication between the councils and to the College Purpose: Keeps the Governance System Organized & Focused on Strategic Governance Agenda College Council College Council Purpose: Reviews & Makes Recommendations to the President about Institutional Purpose, Policy, and Procedures SAMPLE RESPONSIBILITIES Review and revise the College’s Mission, Vision, and Values Review and make recommendations regarding board policy Review & make recommendations on administrative procedures Recommend institutional level plans that require ratification by the board Approves institutional level documents that ultimately must be ratified by the governing board otherwise presented to the board by the superintendent/president. Institutional Effectiveness Council Institutional Effectiveness Council Purpose: Assesses How Well the College Is Doing on Institutional Level Matters & Recommends How to Make Improvements SAMPLE RESPONSIBILITIES Discuss models and trends in higher education Establish institutional level goals and targets Review outcomes to gauge progress on institutional goals Establish and review processes for data-informed decision making & continuous improvement throughout the College Establishes and maintains focus on strategic and student centered goals within the context of continuous improvement and data-informed decision making Institutional Resources Council Institutional Resources Council Purpose: Leverages Resources to Maximize Student Success SAMPLE RESPONSIBILITIES Review and recommend institutional level grant opportunities, technology acquisition decisions, and facilities plans Review and recommend the overall set of PPA budget requests Review hiring protocol and employee on-boarding, recognition, and retention Ensure work flow efficiency to enhance organizational effectiveness Ensure equitable resources at all campuses and centers Prioritizes resources from various funding sources and invests in strategic and student centered goals Student Success Council Student Success Council Purpose: Focuses on Ensuring Student Success & Closing Student Equity Gaps SAMPLE RESPONSIBILITIES Reviews overall alignment between and among academic programs, meta-majors, student services, and grant-funded initiatives Reviews & recommends equitable access to student services across all campuses, centers, and hybrid/online offerings Reviews Institutional learning outcomes Gives voice to the student experience at Hartnell Coordinates and aligns collaborative work at the College to improve student success and equity A closer look at some final details DETAILS ABOUT THE FOUR COUNCILS The councils will be organized using the accreditation standards as a framework In order to promote equity in the governance system on all campuses, all council meetings will be structured to allow for remote participation and guests Each council will put forth agendas focused on action items, not presentations Each council creates and/or discontinues committees and task forces under its purview as appropriate Each council will use a consensus decision making model with built-in contingencies to vote if a consensus cannot be reached About Council Appointments APPOINTMENTS Administrator, faculty, and staff tri-leads for each council Each council will have approximately the same number of members from each of the employee constituent groups and be appointed from these groups: Administrators, Academic Senate, Staff Senate Student members and co-leads appointed from ASHC as appropriate 2-year term except for designated

Now you can make any subject more engaging and memorable