You're about to create your best presentation ever

Doctoral Dissertation Presentation Template

Create your presentation by reusing one of our great community templates.

Doctoral Dissertation Presentation

Transcript: Doctoral Dissertation Presentation Data Analysis Techniques Exploring the Impact of Technology on Education The study utilizes advanced statistical analysis techniques, such as regression analysis and data mining, to interpret the collected data and derive meaningful insights. By applying these techniques, the research aims to uncover patterns and relationships between technology use and educational outcomes. Importance of the Study Understanding the impact of technology on education is crucial for educators, policymakers, and stakeholders to make informed decisions and implement effective practices. This study aims to explore the benefits, challenges, and implications of technology integration in the educational landscape, providing valuable insights for improving learning outcomes and student engagement. Research Methodology Background of Technology in Education Exploring Technology in Education Technology has become integral in educational settings, offering tools for interactive learning, virtual classrooms, and personalized instruction. It has opened new avenues for accessible and inclusive education for all learners, regardless of their location or circumstances. The foundation of the study lies in designing an effective research approach for investigating the impact of technology on education. Technology has revolutionized the field of education, transforming teaching methods and learning experiences. Data Collection Methods The research employs a combination of qualitative and quantitative data collection methods, including surveys, interviews, and classroom observations. By gathering data from multiple sources, the study ensures a comprehensive analysis of technology's impact on educational outcomes. Research Design and Approach Future Trends The future of educational technology is promising, with advancements in AI, virtual reality, and adaptive learning systems set to transform the educational landscape further. The study utilizes a quantitative research design to analyze the correlation between technology integration and academic performance in educational settings. The approach includes surveys, interviews, and observations to gather comprehensive data. Integration in Modern Education Unleashing Student Engagement Through Technology Today, educational technology is seamlessly integrated into classrooms, offering interactive learning experiences and personalized instruction for students. The integration of technology in education has revolutionized student engagement, transforming traditional learning experiences. Evolution of Educational Technology Personalized Learning Experiences Technology enables personalized learning paths tailored to individual student needs, promoting autonomy and self-paced learning. Data-Driven Insights Enhanced Interaction and Participation Enhanced Accessibility and Inclusivity Historical Context The evolution of educational technology has revolutionized the way students learn and teachers teach, shaping the future of education. Utilizing data analytics, educators gain valuable insights into student progress and performance, enabling targeted interventions and support. Technology facilitates interactive learning methods, encouraging active participation and collaboration among students. Technology enhances accessibility for students with diverse needs, ensuring inclusivity and equity in educational opportunities. Educational technology has its roots in the early 20th century with the use of audiovisual aids, evolving through the decades to encompass digital tools and online platforms. Cultivating Lifelong Learning Skills Technology cultivates essential skills such as critical thinking, problem-solving, and digital literacy, preparing students for the dynamic future workforce. Last checks... Adding final touches... Write something high-impact about this photo Polishing up... Dive deep into your first point or make a new one Limit your words so your audience stays focused Share a last point about this concept Use this space for details that you haven’t talked about yet. Hang on... A final point, a quote, more context — adapt the template to fit your needs. Remember that your presentation is almost done, so keep it simple. Thinking cap on... Fine-tuning... Keep your words short and punchy so your audience stays focused. Design at work... Keep it quick You have space for details later Share a last point about this concept Summarize each point you made Give quick call-backs so your audience remembers Leave space for questions

Exploring Doctoral Dissertation Research

Transcript: Blueprint for Research Guides the Dissertation Process Research design serves as the blueprint for the study, detailing how data will be collected and analyzed to address the research question effectively. It encompasses various strategies and frameworks that guide the research process, ensuring that it remains focused and relevant. A well-crafted research question acts as a roadmap for the dissertation, ensuring that all efforts are aligned towards a specific goal. It helps researchers maintain focus throughout the study. Importance of Methodology Key Aspects of Research Design and Methodology Methodology is a critical component that encompasses the techniques used to gather and analyze data. It can be categorized as qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods, each having distinct advantages and suitable applications depending on the research objectives. Minimizes Ambiguity Importance of a Strong Research Question A clear and concise research question minimizes ambiguity, allowing for a more systematic investigation and easier communication of the research intent to others. Validity and Reliability Selecting the appropriate research methodology is essential for the validity and reliability of findings. It impacts how well the research question is answered and the credibility of the conclusions drawn from the data collected. Feasibility and Researchability The question should be researchable and feasible within the given timeframe and available resources, ensuring that it can be effectively addressed by the study. Exploring Doctoral Dissertation Research Quantitative Techniques Qualitative Techniques Quantitative data collection techniques emphasize numerical data and statistical analysis, typically through methods such as surveys, experiments, and existing data analysis. These techniques provide measurable results that can be generalized but may miss the depth of human experiences. Qualitative data collection techniques focus on understanding experiences, thoughts, and motivations through methods like interviews, focus groups, and observations. These approaches yield rich, detailed data but can be subjective and difficult to generalize. A Comprehensive Overview of Methodologies, Challenges, and Contributions Interpreting Data for Meaningful Insights The Foundation of PhD Education Doctoral dissertation research is integral to a PhD program, encapsulating extensive study and inquiry. It encompasses the development of a significant research question, the establishment of a comprehensive research design, and the execution of research aimed at contributing original insights to the academic field. The analysis of research findings is a critical step that transforms raw data into valuable insights. This process not only involves the interpretation of quantitative and qualitative data but also emphasizes the identification of patterns and trends. Understanding these results in relation to the original research question allows researchers to draw informed conclusions and implications for the field. Conclusion and Future Research Directions Summarizing key findings and envisioning future research opportunities. Future Research Directions Key Findings Identifying gaps in the current research and proposing areas for further investigation, encouraging academic exploration. Summarization of the main outcomes and their relevance in the field, showcasing the contribution to existing knowledge. Significance Discussion of the implications of the research findings, emphasizing their importance to practitioners and scholars alike.

Dissertation Presentation Template

Transcript: Hypothesis Confirmation The research confirms the initial hypothesis, demonstrating a significant correlation between the studied variables. Statistical Software Utilization New Insights Conclusion Utilized statistical software such as SPSS and R for quantitative data analysis, enabling robust statistical testing and interpretation. Key findings reveal new insights into the subject area, contributing to the existing body of knowledge and addressing identified gaps in the literature. Future Exploration Qualitative Methods Data Analysis The study highlights the importance of further exploration in this area, suggesting avenues for subsequent research and potential applications. Incorporated qualitative analysis methods, including thematic analysis and coding, to interpret open-ended survey responses and interviews. Data Visualization Employed visualization techniques, such as graphs and charts, to effectively convey the findings and trends observed during the analysis phase. Key Findings and Their Implications The research identified significant trends that align with the stated objectives, revealing insights that could influence future practices and theories in the field. These findings not only contribute to existing knowledge but also suggest areas for practical application and further investigation. Future Research Directions Exploring avenues for continued investigation based on dissertation findings. Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Expand the study to include diverse populations to assess applicability and generalizability. Develop and test interventions based on findings to enhance effectiveness in real-world settings. Investigate the long-term impacts of findings on current practices in the field. Overview of Research Area and Significance Research Methodology Timeline Recent Contributions Seminal Works Column 2 discusses recent studies that address gaps identified in the foundational literature. These studies utilize modern methodologies and perspectives that are essential for advancing the field and informing future research directions. Column 1 focuses on seminal works that have laid the foundation for the research area, detailing their contributions and methodologies. These studies are critical for understanding the evolution of the field and provide a basis for current research questions. An overview of the chronological research design, data collection, and analysis techniques employed in the study. Phase 1: Research Design Engage and Inquire Developed the overall research framework, defining the study type and scope. This is an opportunity for the audience to ask questions and share their insights, fostering a deeper understanding of the dissertation's contributions and findings. This dissertation explores the impact of [insert research topic] on [insert broader field or context], emphasizing its importance in addressing contemporary issues. The significance of this research lies in its potential to contribute to [specific knowledge, practices, or policy improvements]. Identify Key Issues To identify and analyze the primary issues surrounding the chosen research topic, providing a clear understanding of the context and relevance. Evaluate Literature To evaluate existing literature and frameworks related to the topic, pinpointing gaps and opportunities for further exploration. Research Objectives Develop Methodology To develop a comprehensive methodology that allows for effective data collection and analysis, ensuring the validity and reliability of results. Articulate Expected Outcomes To articulate the expected outcomes of the study, providing a framework for assessing its impact and contribution to the field. Dissertation Presentation Template A guide to creating a 2003 PPT template specifically designed for dissertations.

Doctoral Dissertation Final Defense

Transcript: Interactive whiteboard facilitiates assertions (85%) Interactive Whiteboard -Used the most @ 48% TTLs are not your average teachers - application process TTL learning community is a safe culture to take risks - logistics = 45% of the 42% of coded comments that were logistical/social/off-topic Is it common practice to have a logistics facilitator? Problems Identified Recommendations for Further Study What would I do the same? Not try to translate the Elluminate interactions - maybe look at interviewing teachers to get perceptions after a synchronous online discussion Pick teachers for the study population that are not associated with a large school district Summer time was not an ideal time to hold the sessions due to schedule challenges Logistical and social comments dominate the conversation Types of Critical and Integrative Thinking Channels of Communication Is 29% a normal or an unusally high or low percentage of evidence of critical and integrative thinking in a 90-minutes discussion - face2face, asynchronous, or synchronous? Limitations The communication channel of Audio yielded the most evidence of critical and integrative thinking Off-Topic/Social/Logistical: Sharing a comment that is not directly related to the current discussion Content Question: Making a request for information that is related to the content Reflect/Think Aloud: Sharing thoughts that are introspective in nature or indicate a spontaneous comment arising from the conversation Key Findings Case Studied - 29% of coded comments What would I do differently? 29% of coded comments showed evidence of critical and integrative thinking, with 33% of those displaying more than one type Coding Rubrics Where did I deviate from the plan? - collaborative lesson plan design - 79% of critical and integrative thinking comments occurred in audio channel 99% Inter-Rater Reliability RQ1: In a synchronous online conversation that is action orientated using a multi-channel interface (audio text, and interactive media), what sort of talk occurs in each channel, specifically, does each channel facilitate a different function of communication? Functions of Communcation 4% IM facilitates off-topic/social/logistical comments (53%) with majority being logistical (49%) Audio facilitates assertions (44%) and is critical if you want to build logical reasoning comments (95%) Instant Messaging Essential Role of Audio Audio Instant Messaging Interactive Whiteboard Participant Feedback Tools (clap, smile, thumb down, and polling feature) Impact of lesson plan design: 85% of the whiteboard coded comments were assertions - in two parts of the lesson plan participants were asked to add their thoughts to the whiteboard so that ideas could be grouped to form the basis for further discussion 25 instead of 30 TTLs 5 instead of 2 sessions Fine-tuned the wording on my critical thinking research question (#2) Took much longer than expected Definitions 29% of coded comments showed evidence of critical and integrative thinking 33% of those comments showed evidence of 2 or more types of critical and integrative thinking Research Questions Unexpected Findings RQ2: What proportion of a synchronous online conversation using audio, text, and interactive media is occupied by critical thinking? Participant feedback tools facilitate off-topic/social/logistical comments (77%) with majority being social in nature (57%) 95% of BLR were in Audio channel 87% Inter-Rater Reliability - IM was 48% of coded comments Did not address overcoming barriers to synchronous online and instead focused on impact once connected Did not address differences in online synchronous tools Did not address impact of lesson plan design 25 Technology Teacher Leaders (TTLs) employed by the Anchorage School District in Anchorage, Alaska Age range: 37-59+ 7-25 years teaching experience TTL Program: Total of 213 teachers 7 years (12-42 each year) Teams of 2-4 teachers/school Intentional CoP 1 year plus (Once a TTL ~ Always a TTL) 5 graduate credits PD + resources = impact student learning I really liked how the critical thinking provided context to the functions and channels I felt very supported throughout the process Audio Literature Review Highlights Participant Feedback Tools Reflections Both problems continue to be voids in the literature Significance of the Study Rubric uses evidence of linguistic markers found in communication RQ1: An instant message backchannel exists A logistics facilitator is needed Synchronous online communicaiton supports social learning constructs Functions of Communication: Assertion: Making a statement of belief or experiences Build Logical Reasoning: Identifying a series of steps or propositions that may be linked to models Endorsement: Agreeing with a statement made by someone else often providing an example from personal experience Instant messaging and audio are key channels of communication In order to analyze the qualitative importance of each communication channel, we need to RQ 1:

The Qualitative Doctoral Dissertation

Transcript: Lit. Review part duo No Research has been done about the problem Some research has been done about the problem There is an abundance of related litrature An abundance of research has been done Anyone intending to do research involving people should: The Content This section of the proposal must contain a set of questions to be answered. They must be more specific than the general problem statement. Think of this as a "filter" or "lens" you see data through. AKA the theoretical orientation, framework or simply the Backing An Overview and Background This helps build an argument for solving the problem "This study will examine..." Your problem is good to go for research! By Pierre Arellano How to know when it’s ok to research your problem It is important to consult the research in your field to see what has already been done. 2) Thoroughly understand the implications of ethical concepts such as risk, no intent to harm, informed consent, and the right to withdraw The Problem Ethics "I want to explore..." Personal Milestone! Should be specific and concrete 3) Adhere to the formal ethical protocols of the university 1) Don't be naive concerning issues of power and privilege Sigh of Relief! Not much to say really, just give a brief overview of what you are going to cover. Accomplishment! Many of proposals conclude with a plan showing estimated timelines Really Important Tell the reader how the problem will be approached in a detail. It is critical to a proposal to narrow down the problem and come up with specific questions. The quality that your research will be judged "The problem this study will address is..." (If you have the chance, pick something you want to research) The introduction should lead into your problem. Introduction Conclusion In your proposal you should have: 1) Justification for why the problem you have constructed is worth researching. 2) Justification for why the methods you chose are appropriate to the questions the problem generates 3) Must show why the information that your research will generate is needed. 4) Most important, act ethically Theoretical Perspective It’s not so much about finding the problem so much as constructing and developing it over time. The first step of the doctoral journey Justification- why are you researching this problem This is important in a proposal because it is another way a researcher makes his or her findings intelligible to an academic audience and open to scrutiny. Questions Doctoral Dissertation Proposal (If this is the case it's ok, maybe you can see the problem with a different "lens") Method Important: make sure to address the problem as clearly as possible. Information from "The Qualitative Doctoral Dissertation" by Brent Kilbourn This is important when it comes to interpreting the data in a qualitative study. What should a proposal include? You want to tell the reader what the problem is right away. Literature Review Don't It does not have to be complete but it has to be complete enough to convince a potential committee member or supervisor that the researcher has done his or her homework and that the problem is worth researching and hasn't been addressed. Plan and Timelines Doctoral Dissertation Proposal Do Introduction Problem Theoretical Perspective Questions Literature Review Methods Ethics Plan and Timelines

Longo Doctoral Dissertation

Transcript: Dissertation Committee Members Primary Advisor Marcia A. B. Delcourt, PhD Secondary Advisors Janice M. Jordan, PhD Jacob Greenwood, EdD Reader Julia Ferreira, EdD Program Coordinator Marcia A. B. Delcourt, PhD Research Question 2 To what extent and in what manner do critical thinking skills, science process skills, creativity, and program type predict science fair achievement? Small, suburban community of approximately 18,000 Median income: $74,000 Increased diversity over the past 12 years, however predominantly White population Middle school of 690 students Grades 6, 7, and 8 Instrumentation A Perspective on Creativity: Do we, as educators, "teach" creativity? 46 RESEARCH QUESTION 2 CPS Model (Treffinger &Isaksen, 1985) 42 8 52 23 4 Inquiry: a process “driven by the student’s own curiosity, wonder, interest, or passion to understand an observation or solve a problem” (Manconi, Aulls, & Shore, 2008, p. 249). Direct instruction Critical thinking Creative thinking Limitations INTRODUCTION 21 32 Methodology: Treatment characteristics slide 26 Data Screening Visual inspection Multivariate outliers (8) identified and removed (+/- 2 standard deviations) Pretest Descriptive Statistics No significant difference across all variables REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE 5 13 14 25 38 Statistical Assumptions - Posttests Normality (Skewness, Kurtosis) Linearity (Scatterplots/Histograms) Homoscedasticity (Box’s M) Equal variances across groups (Levene’s) Correlation matrix Multicollinearity considerations Connecticut Science Fair Rubric (CSF, 2006) Established validity & reliability Assesses science fair achievement based on four components: Scientific thought Creative ability Thoroughness Skill Clarity Inter-rater reliability established in this study Two raters: Cronbach’s alpha = .941 Three raters: Cronbach’s alpha = .965 Findings: Research Question 1 Posttest Descriptive Statistics 50 15 The Need for Middle School Inquiry Research 40 Treatment Timeline 49 IMPLICATIONS 35 A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was implemented and interval data were analyzed to determine if there is a difference in student critical thinking skills, science process skills, and creativity between students in inquiry-based instruction and direct instruction classrooms Independent variable: Program Type with 2 levels Dependent variables: 7 Bonferronni correction: alpha level set at .025 slide 39 LIMITATIONS Implications for Future Research 48 31 Torrance, 1972 Multiple Linear Regression for Model 2 Multiple R was significant for the second block, F(1, 170) = 4.212, p < .001 Within this model, science process skills (p < .025) contributed significantly to the prediction of science fair achievement KEY FINDING: Program type contributed significantly to the prediction of science fair achievement scores above and beyond the other predictor variables associated with model 1, predicting 16.5% of the variance in science fair project scores in model 2 3 Methodology Data and Findings Research Question 1 Data and Findings Research Question 2 Daddy promised me one "slide" INQUIRY INSTRUCTION California Measure of Mental Motivation (CM3) (Giancarlo, 2010) A measure of critical thinking Established validity & reliability 4-point Likert-type Five scales Pretest and Posttest 28 Data and Findings Research Question 1 Rationale Findings Research Question 1 Step 1: Identify or create a puzzling situation. Step 2: Gather information about the topic by asking “Yes/No” questions related to your puzzling situation or dilemma. Document your findings. Step 3: Develop a hypothesis based on your information. Step 4: Organize the data (evidence) and formulate an explanation for the puzzle. Be prepared to defend this explanation. Step 5: Analyze your inquiry process and propose improvements. Step 6: Create five more puzzling situations that can be investigated. <--- Convergent Thinking ---> Data and Findings Research Question 2 Instrumentation Suchman Inquiry Example Review of the Literature "We only think when we are confronted with problems." -John Dewey Follow-up analysis 1 INSTRUMENTATION 51 Instrumentation 29 Science Curriculum Science fair process Lab activities based upon state science inquiry standards Creative and Critical Thinking Skills Creative Problem Solving (CPS) Model (Treffinger & Isaksen, 1985) Suchman Inquiry Model (Suchman, 1968) Methodology: Description of the Setting EFFECTS OF AN INQUIRY-BASED SCIENCE PROGRAM ON CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS, SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS, CREATIVITY, AND SCIENCE FAIR ACHIEVEMENT OF MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS Christopher M. Longo Western Connecticut State University March 10, 2012 Development of instruction that stimulates students to brainstorm effectively Development of skills needed to understand how to conduct scientific investigations Production of more authentic and meaningful products, such as labs and science fair projects Exploration of meaningful content by discovering knowledge using limited assistance Review of the

Now you can make any subject more engaging and memorable