Transcript: The cases were combined because they all sought desegregation of schools as the remedy of grossly inadequate conditions in segregated black schools Amber Fiedler Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court declared state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students to be unconstitutional. impact the U.S The vote on Brown v. Board of Education was unanimous, meaning that all nine justices voted the same way. The ruling in the case was written by Earl Warren, who was Chief Justice. The Court bears much of the blame for this. The justices of the mid-1950s came of age at a time when judges routinely struck down federal child labor laws and other progressive legislation, citing dubious theories of the Constitution. Judges Brown v. board of education 1954 Holding major argument Background on brown v board of education Chief Justice Warren delivered the court's opinion, stating that "segregated schools are not equal and cannot be made equal, and hence they are deprived of the equal protection of the laws." This ruling in favor of integration was one of the most significant strides America has taken in favor of civil liberties. Dissenting Harry Briggs was one of twenty plaintiffs who were charging that R.W. Elliott, as president of the Clarendon County School Board, violated their right to equal protection under the fourteenth amendment by upholding the county's segregated education law argument Supreme court powerpoint I think the brown v board of education is the most important case in the u.s because it helped people realize that even if the kids are not white or not black they can still go to school together. Pictures brown v board of education
Transcript: District Courts- Lowest level of the court system; Misdemeanors and lesser crimes and claims are heard here Circuit Courts- Second level of the court system; Hears appeals form District Courts and more serious criminal and civil cases, such as divorce Court of Special Appeals and Court of Appeals- Third level of the court system; Hears cases appealed from the Circuit Courts Federal Levels This system's impact on society is that it protects the safety of the innocent and the guilty. It protects the innocent because it pulls the dangerous and detrimental citizens from society, preventing them from harming others. Its protects the guilty because it stops unfair punishment, by enforcing the 8th Amendment and taking them away from places where they will be unfairly harmed because of their crimes, and it makes sure that the guilty are actually guilty by going through the extensive process that is established for the court system. Steps Cont. The innocent person will be compensated for the time spent. Each amount of money given depends upon each situation. One person, William Dillon, was given 1.35 million dollars for spending 27 years in prison. One sole case of an innocent person being im- prisoned does not spark a massive change in the court system, but it can be one case out of a large number of cases used against the court system to cause a change although it does have a minor impact on the Court System. It shows flaws in the system that were not known before. Another case, Kenneth Waters, showed that there is false testimonies and corrupt police work in the system. District Courts- Lowest level federal court; Hears nearly all categories of federal crimes Court of Appeals- Second level federal court; Hears appealed cases from the District Courts Court of Appeals for Armed Forces- Third level federal court; Hears cases concerning armed forces members Supreme Court- Fourth/Highest level federal court; Hears cases appealed from Court of Appeals; Decision is final Court System State Levels Bibliography Steps Impact Picture On Slide 5: Unknown Title.Vanessa Miller.Unknown Collection.2012.4/16/14 http://www.kcg.com/news/crime/convicted.killer Roadblock An innocent person is put in jail for a crime they did not commit. How does the court system change to prevent this? Thank you! Pictures On Slide 4- Grand Jury.Unknown Photographer.Unknown Collection.2013.4/16/14 http://www.ventura.org/grand jury Hancuffed Man.Kevin Kurtis. Handcuffs Art.2013.4/16/14 http://fineartamerica.com/art/all/handcuffs/all/ Step 1- Investigation: Police investigate crime and gather evidence Step 2- Initial Appearance: Judge explains charges and defendant pleas guilty or trial is set, along with bail Step 3- Grand Jury: Review prosecutor's evidence and indicts suspect if enough evidence Step 4- Plea Bargain: Ends process if defendant pleas guilty to lesser crime for lesser punishment Step 5- Arraignment and Plea: Is the defendants 2nd appearance in court and is formally charged, and the defendant pleas "guilty" or "not guilty" Step 6- Trial: Defendant chooses for a jury or judge to determine verdict and the prosecutors and defense attorneys present case Step 7- Verdict: Judges gives jury instructions and judge or jury must find suspect guilty beyond reasonable doubt Step 8- Sentencing: If not guilty, suspect is released, or if guilty, the judge gives a sentence
Transcript: Intro By Gary Godfrey Criminal Jurisdiction Court Report Presentation Civil Jurisdiction The High Court of Australia is the nation’s highest court. The high court is found in Canberra, Brisbane, Adelaide, Perth and Hobart. The high court of Australia was established in 1901, the functions of the High Court are to interpret and apply the law of Australia.The seat of the High Court is in Canberra,the High Court of Australia is able to deal with cases which come to it on appeal or which begin in the High Court itself. High Court
Transcript: Anton is the local logger. the autopsy shows insignificant oxygen in 21 fish. Sediment can clog a fish's gills so then it wouldn't be able to breath. Sediment can go into the rivers which then go into the Gray Bay. Erosion can be caused by logging, it can lead to three things that can cause fish to die. Believes that selective cut area should be salvage, he also said that rafta river isn't a problem when the missterssippis are. Anton Alogue is guilty
Transcript: huddle Mrs. Rossi huddle to crowd together crowd huddle separate
Transcript: Verdict Issue: Question being asked to the supreme court for it to decide Does the first amendment protect a public school students right to free speech even though it could be vulgar in nature Arguements Of Each Side: How did they not violate their rights? Matthew Fraser Matthew Fraser contended that the suspension violated his First Amendment rights b/c his speech caused no disruption of school activities within the meaning of Tinker. Amendment 1: Speech, Press, and Assembly Arguements of Each Side:How was their rights violated? Erliscia Jones, Amira Grice, Symone Holliday Bethel High School The decsion narowed the Tinker rule and clarified the right of schools to place limits on lewd, obsence, or offensive speech 7 votes for Bethel High School , 2 votes against The court found that it was appropriate for the school to prohibit the use o vulgar and offensive language Background At a school assembly of approximately 600 high school students, Matthew Fraser made a speech nominating a student for elective ofice. In his speech, Fraser used what some observers believed was a graphic sexual metaphor to promote the candidancy of his friend. As a part of the disciplinary code, Bethel High School enforced a rule prohibiting conduct which "substantially interferes with the educational process.... including the use of obscene, profane language or gestures."Fraser was suspended from school for two days. Bethel School District #403 vs. Fraser (1986) Importance The supreme court found that Fraser use of vulgar and offensive language in a political speech is not protected by the first amendment of free speech because it contradicted the values of he public school system, so they had the right to punish Fraser.
Transcript: THANK YOU! JUSTICE RYAN BURROWS DAVE TEAM COMMANDER + PRIMARY INVESTIGATOR + FILE MANAGER ASSIST TO CROWN PROSECUTOR INCREDIBLY PREPARED 2009 TO THE COURT SYSTEM POSSESSION OF PROCEEDS OF CRIME TRIED BY JUDGE ONLY DEFENSE LAWYER #2 $16,000 MEGEYSI Court Clerk POLICE PULL OVER AN ERRACTIC DRIVER @ 11PM UNINTERESTED & DISENGAGED TRIAL 2 - SGT. ANDERSON Crown & Defense Assistant SEARCH AFTER ARREST SEIZED OFFICIAL TRIAL & BRINGING OF EVIDENCE KEEN ON ORGANIZATION OF DOCUMENTS SGT. ANDERSON 9 SUSPECTS TAKEN DOWN CONSPIRACY TO TRAFFIC LLOYD + PAZDER UTILIZES WIRETAP PROCEDURES TO GAIN INFORMATION Guard COCAINE 28g WEDNESDAY OF AN OFFENSIVE WEAPON REGARDING ITO'S FOR THE PURPOSES OF TRAFFICKING (2 COUNTS) RYAN LLOYD ALDABA Accused PAZDER ON POINT WITH ANSWERS, REFERENCED NOTEBOOK GUARD STORY 2011 JASON ON WHETHER OR NOT CERTAIN DRAFT AFFIDAVITS SHOULD BEEN RETAINED BORED & UNINVOLVED RCMP Project CORRECT PROCEDURES REGARDING DRAFTING ITO'S - INFORMATION TO OBTAIN WARRANT MENTORING IN EXPERIENCED MEMBERS USIN ERD - EVIDENCE & REPORTING DATABASE PRINTING ITO RESULTS EDITING ITO RESULTS REVIEWING SRDS - SOURCE DEBRIEFING REPORTS ASKED TO CLARIFY WHY HE BECAME ACTING COMMANDER FOR THE INVESTIGATION CASE: DRUG TRAFFICKING DECEMBER - JANUARY PETER CROFT, 32 General RYAN LLYOD OPEN ABOUT CONFUSION Court DEFENSE LAWYER #1 CROWN PROSECTOR #1 JASON CLARKE BACK QUICK TO PROVIDE NUMBERS WHEN DOCUMENTS WERE SUBMITTED (Sgt. Anderson) POSSESSION OF WEAPON CHARGES RCMP COURT STARTED ON TIME NATALIE • CARRIE-ANN • KEN • THOMAS • RAYMOND TEAM Our group attended VERY DETAILED QUESTIONS METHAMPHETAMINE 90g SECOND WIRETAP INITIATED CORRECT PROCEDURES REGARDING DRAFTING ITO'S - INFORMATION TO OBTAIN WARRANT DRAFTING TEXT MESSAGES WHEN INVESTIGATING IS THE AFFIANT ALWAYS RELIANT ON THE WIRE ROOM INVESTIGATION TEAM BEHIND TEXT MESSAGES CLERK OF THE COURT FIRST WIRETAP INITIATED, LASTED 60 DAYS TREVOR ON CHARGES OF OCTOBER 22 CURRENTLY OF THE PROCEEDS OF CRIME IDENTIFY & DISMANTLE NETWORKS OF NARCOTIC TRAFFICKING ACTIVITY MAY 26, 2010 STOJAN Judge CHANGES Lawyers SEPT 19, 2010 SHOOK HANDS WITH ACCUSED DURING RECESS JONATHON SAFEWAY STEVEN Crown FASTER COURT SYSTEM MORE COURT HOUSES FULFILL JUSTICE SYSTEM VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE DAWSON ANOTHER PRE-TRIAL MOTION JEWLERY ACCUSED TRIAL 1 Court Reporter WHIPPLE FINAL DECISION POSSESSION FOR THE PURPOSE OF TRAFFICKING FALL 2009 99 AVE, 50 ST CROWN PROSECUTOR #2 PRE-TRIAL MOTION Lawyers APRIL/MAY 2014 Witness HEAD OF OPERATIONS ASSIST TO DEFENSE LAW #2 WOODEN BATON POSSESSION 30 RCMP MEMBERS DECEMBER EPS GREEN TEAM PAUL PAZDER RCMP RECEIVED ASSISTANCE FROM CALGARY, SURREY RCMP & EPS I BELIEVE IN THE CANADIAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. SOMETIMES, FROM A POLICE PERSPECTIVE, JUSTICE DOESN'T COME AS SWIFTLY AS ONE WOULD HOPE ELIMINATING SOME PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS COULD EXPEDITE THE SYSTEM PLEA BARGAINS HAVE THEIR PLACE, YET IT DEPENDS ON THE CHARGES AND THE CIRCUMSTANCES. WASSIM CROFT QB COURT OVERWHELMING AMOUNT OF BINDERS Friday November 15, 2013 COURT REPORTER DARREN SGT. ANDERSON OBSERVED LAUGHING WITH ACCUSED DURING RECESS Defense KHEMISTRY ASKED TO GIVE BRIEF OVERVIEW OF POLICING CAREER IN RCMP FOCUSED ON EXPERIENCE WITH SPECIALIZED DRUG SECTIONS TOUCHED ON UNDERCOVER, HOMICIDE AND MAJOR CRIME TECHNIQUES + OF STOLEN PROPERTY OVER $5,000 JULY 26, 2010 LAWYERS SHARING LAUGHS DETAILED QUESTIONS AS WELL BROOKS PAUL SGT. MARK ANDERSON BUSY ON LAPTOPS & PHONES, GOING OVER DOCUMENTATION PAUL PAZDER OBSERVATIONS RAHIMI ASSIST TO DEFENSE LAW #1 APRIL 28 DILIGENTLY TYPNG, VERY INVOLVED STEVEN SERIOUS, THOROUGH AND PROMPT CHARGED WITH
Transcript: 10 month baby + Mom killed Court Room How the world is corrupted and need Jesus and that the only real person you can depend on is God :) Painful Eye-opener Judge Majeke Mabesele, on Wednesday sentenced 18 years for the grandparents for rape and death, of there 1o month grandchild and daughter The baby of Adriaan Netto and his girlfriend died a painful death by the girlfriends parents Gods Wonders A couple convicted for the rape and death of a baby and the mother
Description: Storytelling is at the heart of great service. Use this stunning, customizable business presentation template to highlight employees who do exceptional work or position your customers as the heroes of your business.
Description: Add some color to your quarterly business review with this vibrant business presentation template. The bold visuals in this business template will make your next QBR a memorable one.
Description: The sky’s the limit. Boost your new sales initiative into orbit with an engaging and compelling SKO presentation. This template features a effective sales kickoff theme that makes it easy to be engaging. Like all Prezi SKO templates, it’s fully customizable with your own information.
Description: Catch the eye and engage the imagination with this cool-looking Prezi proposal template. The bold, bright design and highly dynamic theme all but guarantee success for your next sales or marketing proposal. All Prezi presentation templates are easily customized.
Now you can make any subject more engaging and memorable