You're about to create your best presentation ever

Thin Blue Line Presentation Background

Create your presentation by reusing one of our great community templates.

Thin Blue Line

Transcript: The Thin Blue Line WHO Who Is Involved? 1) The Canadian Government 2) RCMP Board of Directors 3) Canadian citizens and inhabitants WHy Long-running issues in RCMP policies, budget cuts and cuts to employee benefits including dentistry, optometry and personal protection equipment like bullet proof vests. Why Where This is happening internationally, with slight differences to each nation. I am focussing on Canada, and Moncton, NB. Where? When Budget cuts have been happening since 1940, though ones taking away from employee health, and their salary have been having a bigger affect in the recent years. It's hard to say exactly when it started being political news, though you could say the budget cuts have been more publicized since 2017, when Moncton police started to tape over their traditional reflection stripes on their pants. When How The government introduced a new RCMP budget last year, offering 69 million dollars over the course of five years starting this earlier this year. This leaves the RCMP roughly 20 million a year to give for mental health, taking out of the RCMP's budget of 15.1 billion-12.4 of that being used to pay salaries and paid-leaves. The other 3.5 of the budget is used for personal protection equipment, training and benefits for our 30 300 officers. How WHY In 2017, the government backed up their 14% compensation difference from RCMP members to public servants by saying '"The government simply cannot compare the salaries of an RCMP member and a public servant. Police officers obviously have completely different jobs, and take significantly more risks, comparable to public servants, and the only fair wage for an RCMP member is one that is in-line with another police officer, doing the same job," Creasser said.' At the time, an RCMP members salary was 20 000 less than an Officer of Calgary's. Why Shooting of Moncton The RCMP went to trial in April 2017 after three patrol officers were shot dead in Moncton, 2014. The Federal Labor Department is charging the RCMP with four counts of failing to provide sufficient skills, equipment or weaponry to defend against the gunman. In and interview, Sgt. Backus said "When it comes to equipment, when it comes to pay, the RCMP is the dollar store of policing." Sgt. Backus continued to say "If I get disciplined, or if I get fired for this, it will be the proudest moment of my RCMP career." Moncton, NB Issues ~Over all, budget cuts indirectly cause dysfunctional actions and suicide rates in the RCMP. ~Physical health declines as RCMP aren't allowing smaller paid leaves due to injuries off field due to budget cuts. ~RCMP officers are being overworked due to under employment. ~Superiors are only acknowledging national and public problems, not those of smaller jurisdictions or towns. Swept Under the Rug Questions? QUestions?

THIN BLUE LINE

Transcript: This movie was made as a documentary by Errol Morris who decided to believe that Randell Adams was innocent and that Errol Morris will find the truth about him and to sent Randell free. Morris became more eager to understand on the event that occurred of the death of the officer Robert Woods who people believe that it was Randell who shot the officer. But Errol Morris finds that hard to believe so Morris decided to investigate more interviews and to try to solve the puzzle. Soon Errol investigates on David who he believes it was him who did the shooting on the officer. Soon Randell was innocent but Harris was responsible sense he confess on what happened. David Harris David Harris Randell Adams try's to tell the story on his view on what actually happen on the death of the officer Robert Woods leading officers to rely on witnesses including David Harris. "Adams’ ordeal began on November 27, 1976, when he ran out of gas and hitched a ride with sixteen-year-old David Harris. Harris dropped Adams off around ten o’clock that night, and Adams figured he had seen the last of the strange kid who had liked showing off his .22-caliber pistol. Less than three hours later, Dallas police officer Robert Wood was dead". Randell says he had gone home and he went to sleep on his bed. Errol Morris $ 3.45 His view in the crime Monday, February 17, 2014 Randell Adams David Harris was with Randell Adams on the night when officer Robert Woods was shot by David. David blamed Randell that he shot the officer on that night leading Randell 18 years in prison making Randell take all the blame while David lives without any punishment. Not only that but David has commented many crimes before and after the event. David said they both met in the street when he saw Randell caring gasoline while David picks him up and they both travel the night watching movies and eating. Soon David and Randell both get stopped by Robert Woods officer then a split second David Harris shoots Robert Woods. Later David says that Randell was in the drivers were he says he shot him while David was in the passenger seat. Errol Morris has finally convince the people on what actually happen by reviling the truth that David has told him and that Randell was innocent saying that Randell was telling the truth on what the event has happen.Errol Morris movie leading to real people who told many things on the case leads Randell telling the truth and David saying that Randell was saying the truth during the interview.At the end of the movie David is recorded on what he has said saying about Randell's innocence while David is soon to be executed leading the people to believe on what David say. Soon after the movie Randell is free by Errol Morris while David soon became executed by the police.After that the people now understand on how all this happen and how it ended with this crime ending. All because of Errol Morris. His way of the crime. Background Information Vol XCIII, No. 311 THE THIN BLUE LINE Errol Morris convincing the people

The Thin Blue Line

Transcript: When the movie begins we are automatically shown flashing red lights on different buildings and cop cars. It makes us sense danger. It makes us alert, it tells us something bad has happened. As the interviews with Randall Adams and David Harris begin we are shown an aerial view of the city and map where Randall and David first met. It shows various streets intersecting. Maybe the director is trying to say that Adams and Harris crossing paths wasn't a coincidence. Maybe they were supposed to meet. Through out the beginning reenactments of the incident are repeatedly shown each time a little different and each time as affective. Seeing and hearing the shooting continuously appeals to the viewers sense of pathos. It makes them feel as if they were there. It makes them feel fearful for the second cop, sad for the cop that was killed, and anger towards the shooter. These scenes also carry a sense of logos because it is a reenactment of a real life event. They are true facts that are being visually represented. During the reenactment of the shooting when the gun is being fired it is the only noise you hear. It is loud and it is strong. When you hear the gun shot it grasps your attention. It makes you feel as if the pistol was firing at you and makes you jump. It makes you feel scared and alarmed. Right before the cop is shot he is shown walking toward the blue comet. As he gets nearer and nearer to the car the only sound you hear is the sound of his footsteps. There is no other noise. It creates suspense and tension because you know something bad is about to happen. As Adams is being interviewed he explains that when the police were seeking a confession from him he states that they kept him for a long time. During the reenactment of this scene the camera pans to a ticking clock and a newspaper that changes dates. He purposely does this to show the drastic change in time. While the interviewees are talking about what happened in the courtroom, a painting of Randall is shown. In the painting you can see that Randall looks afraid, you can see and feel his sadness and pain. It connects to your emotions and you feel pity for him. Newspaper clippings from the time the incident occurred are constantly being shown but there is a specific photograph of Randall where it is zoomed into his face completely. The interesting thing about this picture is that it is hard to tell it's him. The picture is dark and blurry. It's a metaphor. It represents how the police officers aren't entirely sure that Randall is guilty. It shows there uncertainty because maybe if they were positive, they could have used a clearer image. When the cop is being hypnotized the background music begins to speed up. The music gives off the idea of how anxious the cops are for answers. How quickly and how desperately they are to get them. Also it makes the cop that is being hypnotized seem suspicious, because before she was hypnotized she gave a statement and afterward she gave a completely different statement. As Randall is talking about the evening he spent with David clips of movies are shown at the drive-in and in one of the clips there is a girl chanting, "we want a victory and we're gonna get it!" This represents the cops desire to catch the criminal. They want to find the murderer and they will do anything to do so, even blaming an innocent person. When the cops find the blue Comet car that was being driven by the murderer the background music gets louder, faster, and more upbeat. The music reflects on how happy the policemen must have felt because they found the get-away car and are one step closer to solving the crime. In the last few minutes of the film we are told a story of how David's younger brother had died. As the story is being told we are shown images of a young, baby David and we are reminded that he has not always been a criminal. That at one point he was a normal, innocent, sweet young boy. We pity David for turning out how he did and we feel sad hearing the story of his brother. When the cop, who has known David through out most of his crimes, talks about Harris' criminal record an image of an arrest warrant appears. This reminds the viewers of his past, that he has committed several crimes in his life and that even after the murder of the cop he still continues to commit them. It makes the viewers wonder how the cops could accuse a man with no criminal history over a boy who had done so much. During a review of David's past crimes we are told he had enlisted in the military and also shown a picture of him in his military uniform. Army men are people who go off to war and fight to protect others but David was a criminal, more than once. The picture makes the viewers think that maybe he wasn't such a bad person after all, that he had been good and he did try and help but as the story continues we learn that it isn't entirely true. After the death of his older brother Harris' parents had another son. Harris states that his younger

Thin Blue Line

Transcript: The third and final part of this documentary reveals the recorded confession of David Harris. Morris just shows a simple image of a cassette player, playing the voice of Harris. While being interviewed, he cues in on the fact that he was in fact there and because of that if Adams claims he's innocent, then he is. The camera changes angles of the cassette player, focusing not only on the voices but the visual. Although Morris did lose the footage of the actual interview, the showing of just the cassette player creates an eerie and dramatic effect along with the subtitles, signifying the convict's words. As the middle of the documentary nears, the audience starts to envision more of the story with the multiple reenactments involved. For example, the reenactment of the shooting gives an input on how the night potentially went. Other significant visuals that appeared were close-ups of the pack of cigarettes and the swinging watch. The cigarettes symbolized the time era; most men of that time smoked so it represented the common-ness of smoking. Someone as normal as everyone else could have killed someone. Along with that period of time, Morris included footage of drive-in theaters and films relinquishing the time period. He set the setting correctly. As for the swinging watch, that represents the time passing. When it swung fast, time went by faster and vice versa. Another key visual was the milkshake being dropped. This was significantly shown in the documentary because later, it challenges the officer's story landing in a different position than where he said it did. He also included various interviews, all with different backgrounds and stories showing variation including those of the false witnesses and uses painted pictures from the courtroom conveying the image of the trial while also explaining it via interviews. Last, for a great chunk of time, the music stops signifying that the voices and what they saying was more vital than the dramatic effect. The audience is who the speaker is trying to reach out to, basically people of authority that find Randall Adams guilty. He's trying to persuade to the audience that things aren't always what they seem. Look beyond what is presented to you. Morris portrays a sense of ethics when he puts in the interviews of the convicts because he uses their actual words and stories. By using their words, the viewers are able to see for themselves the convicts' perspectives of how things really went down that night. Also, Morris displays clippings of newspaper headlines from that night displaying credibility from new sources. These facts convey a sense of logos. The music also creates the mood, serving as a pathos effect by connecting to the viewers' emotions. It provokes a suspenseful and fearful emotion from the viewers because they have yet to figure out what's next. "That's the man! I saw that man!" Thin Blue Line is a documentary created in 1988 about the investigation of a police officer murdered in Dallas, Texas in 1976. Errol Morris, the creator of this documentary, shed light on the question of whether or not the culprit Randall Adams was fully guilty or not. 16-year-old David Harris was with Adams that night and over the course of the documentary, evidence starts to unfold slowly clearing Adams' name and paving the way for his guilt. The subject is what the speaker is talking about and that would be the case. The whole documentary is based off of what happened the night that police officer was killed and the outcome of that. Background Information This final part of the documentary shares a pathos aspect right before the cassette player reveals the confession. Adams explains the whole idea of death row and how he's instantly treated like a criminal when he's done nothing wrong. They give him no hope, and that just connects to how the audience views his situation. As for logos, the audience is revealed to the actual events of that day by Harris, so now they are able to have solid facts as to what happened. An ethos affect would be the fact that now these are Harris' words. His words are credible since he was there and finally hinting to what actually happened. Rhetorical Triangle The Revelation The speaker is Errol Morris. He's trying to convince the audience that there is more to the case then perceived. "I wanted to make a film about how truth was difficult to know, not impossible to know." He focuses on revealing the quizzical aspects of this case. Morris shows a glimpse of ethos when presenting the witnesses of Adams' trial. He sort of solves the case on his own time, deeming true credibility. He then shows that those witnesses were in fact, not liable due to the mere point that they were paid $20,000 to frame Adams. This also contributes to the logos aspect, because he discovers the actual facts of the crime. Another logos effect is each of the interviews he records. They are words of the people that were actually there, so they are credible. The pathos effect of

The Thin Blue Line

Transcript: 8 Hour Shift VS 12 Hour Shift 12 Hour Shift 8 Hour Shift Instant backup Less injury to police Contact and cover officer together Two pairs of eyes to watch instead of one Navigate easier 8 hour shifts and 12 hours shifts both have many advantages and disadvantages Con: Two Person Car Officers working a 12 hour shift could have greater levels of sleepiness and lower levels of alertness by the end of the shift TWO Person Car Productivity 8hrs 5 days is 40 hours a week Some agencies have went to a 10 hour shift to try and fix some problems from the other shifts Having the 12 hr shift on your days off the first day you would be catching up on sleep and the day before you go back you would get extra sleep to prepare yourself for the following cramming days The Thin Blue Line Con: One Person Car A 3 day a week work schedule with an additional day every three weeks. This schedule was proposed to get police a fixed schedule, as opposed to the rotating 8 hour shifts that are the norm across the nation. This shift would allow officers 4 days off a week for family time, sleep, and their overall lives outside work. This plan has many advantages, mainly in morale, police officer health, family life, and even on the job performance. Morale cont. Its a eight hour work day Five days in a row Followed by two days off very popular due to fitting into schedules having day, midnight, and swing shifts Pro: One Person Car Summary http://www.nij.gov/ PRO: TWO Person Car http://forums.officer.com/t97941/ http://forums.officer.com/t110186/ https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=67148 Shissler, T. (1996, May). Shift Work and Police Scheduling. Law and Order . Illinois. Sundermeier, J. (2008, March). The Police Chief: The Professional Voice of Law Enforement. A Look at the 12-Hour Shift: The Lincoln Police Department Study . Lincoln, Nebraska. ONE Person Car Morale More police injury in high crime areas Nearest backup could be far away Officer has to look and drive at the same time Office has to navigate and drive at same time Would you want your back up as an officer to be tired from working 11 hours when your lives could be at risk from a dangerous call? One person cars are more alert of what is going on due to having to watch your own back and know what is going on. Only have to worry about your own safety and that of the suspect or victim. You don’t have to worry about a partner. Two person cars allow for possible bad partners, distractions from partners and a false security. Officers in one person cars are less likely to be injured or killed than two person cars. Fatigue is a huge concern with productivity in the 12 hour shift. This is helped by the more hours of sleep the officers get, as stated before. Another study of statistics compiled by a Department in Louisiana that switched to a 12 hour work schedule showed that there was a 26 % increase in overall arrests as well increases in the amounts of moving violation citations by almost 56 %. A separate department in Palos Verdes, California, also reported a 49% increase in moving violation citations they also found officers were more likely to initiate arrests. Safety High crime should have officers with immediate help at there side while a low crime setting could have backup just close behind 8 hrs a shift you can still be alert and get sleep to be prepared for the next shift the following day 12 hour shift schedules have huge advantages. They increase the amount of sleep, time with the family, and overall mood. The increased amount of sleep has the biggest impact on the officer’s health, decreasing fatigue and the various health problems that come with sleep deprivation. They help re-new the sense of enthusiasm they have for their job that they may have lost before. They also cost departments less because of the less amount of overtime paid out. Two person Patrol Car VS One Person Patrol Car The increase in morale and less time worked leads to officers taking less days off for sick time. This is because the days count for much more money, officers don’t get sick as often since they are generally healthier, and they actually want to go into work. Overtime is also affected. At the end of shifts sometimes officers get involved in some action and have to stay late to do paperwork and such. Since there are only two shift changes a day (noon and midnight) overtime at the end of the shift is decreased by a 1/3 automatically, as 8 hour schedules have to have 3 shift changes. The less overtime used is beneficial to the department because it costs less. Summary In a study done on the Lincoln Police department of Nebraska on 37 officers over a year long period, statistics were compiled in many categories of the job. 77 % of officers found that their moods were “very good” during the implementation, while the other 23 % felt “fine” or no change. 77 % of their families had also noted positive changes in their overall mood or behavior while they were off duty. 84 % liked

thin blue line

Transcript: Walking the 'thin blue line' Introduction www.your-website.com March 2017 Insert some text here Methodology Third Headline Here Insert your own text here. Talk about something related to your third topic or just put some placeholder text here. Third Headline Here 1. Scholarly research Methodology Insert your own text here. Talk about something related to your second topic or just put some placeholder text here. Insert your own text here. Talk about something related to your second topic or just put some placeholder text here. 2. Ethnography Interviews “ to civilians, everything looks like excessive use of force. But use of force is a tool. There is a scale. I could punch someone in the face and restrain him, or I could shoot him. But all civilians see is me punching him in the face, not his aggression towards officers trying to make an arrest” Sergeant Richard Ehrlich 19 years in the force Army Ranger 24 years in the force created FIT Detective John Hendrick "I'll never condone police brutality but I know where it comes from" Click to edit text One year in the force- wanted to be a police officer since she was 5 years old Officer Bronstein "The most challenging part is knowing you did everything you could but it's still not enough." "I don't have emotion" “the increasing reach and power of this vast law enforcement network represents the single biggest threat to freedom, liberty, law, and order in America today” - Steinberg Literature Review Literature Review Insert your own text here. Talk about something related to your first topic or just put some placeholder text here. Subtopic 1 The Heroic Cop Narrative Robin Steinberg : Subtopic 2 Subtopic 1 Fourth Headline Here Insert your own text here. Talk about something related to your fourth topic or just put some placeholder text here. Insert your own text here. Talk about something related to your fourth topic or just put some placeholder text here.

Thin Blue Line

Transcript: Errol Morris The first step Morris takes towards clearing Randall Adams’ name is in introducing Adams to audiences in a radically different way than the prosecution did. Morris begins the film by splicing together interviews with Adams and the other suspect, David Harris, in which the two detail the events that led up to the murder. What Happened That Night? Corruption David Harris discovers Randall Adams out of gas on the side of the road The two spend the day drinking, smoking, and going to the movies Adams claims he went back to the motel, Harris says the two went driving and were stopped by the police late at night Sometime in the night, Officer Robert Wood is fatally shot Adams is arrested, and eventually convicted After Mackenzie T, Anna J, and Hope G. Background Discussion Karma/Fate An evidentiary hearing was held because of the evidence revealed by the film Harris recanted his earlier testimony Emily Miller committed perjury Adams was released in March of 1989 and received no money from the state of Texas Adams sued Morris for the rights of the film's content Adams lived quietly and died in 2010 at 61 of a brain tumor Harris was executed in 2004 for an unrelated murder. In some ways, Morris shows the manipulation of prosecutions based on his own manipulated narrative The prosecution frames a certain narrative of Harris to the courtroom, while Morris frames a narrative of the trial to the viewer Hes keenly aware of the ways information can be presented in order to manipulate the reaction Narration Each person telling the story the way they remember it-unreliable narrator Plants disbelief in each interview, so audience doesn't know who to believe The disorientation between re-enactments and interviews, changes in little details Film Technique Uncertainty Karma/Fate Corruption Covers the investigation of the murder of a Dallas police officer, Robert Wood and the wrongful conviction of Randall Adams Utilizes interviews along with dramatic re-enactments Develops character's back stories Clips Themes Overview began working as a NY private detective after his first two films to fund projects uses techniques not traditionally seen in documentaries originally was in Dallas working on a film about a criminal psychiatrist known as "Doctor Death" when he met Randall Adams Spent 2-1/2 years tracking down people involved in the Adams case to appear in the film Other films: The Fog of War and Fast, Cheap, & Out of Control Thin Blue Line uses actors and dramatic techniques to illuminate truths documentary is edited for narrative clarity in order to build a credible case However, Morris mixes genres as the dramatized murder scenes are juxtaposed with interviews this style offers the filmmaker an alternative way to direct the narration of the events and thus allows Morris to emphasize his own beliefs that Adams was tried unfairly "Police are the thin blue line separating society from anarchy." Do the police ever feel as if they were wrong? Circumstantial evidence and unreliable witnesses Released in 1988 Written and directed by Errol Morris Produced by Mark Lipson Score by Philip Glass 12 wins and 5 nominations American Cinema Editors, USA Edgar Allen Poe Awards Disqualified from the Oscars for Best Documentary because of its scripted content Among the "1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die" Thin Blue Line Uncertainty Harris being the one who stops to help Adams "Guess you could say he went to jail because he didn't have no place for someone who helped him out to stay." continued Morris rejects the idea of that truth and objectivity are necessarily linked He abandons Cinema Verité and instead presents docu-drama reenactments that inspire a sense of self-reflexivity for the viewer His murky and distorted reenactments are high conscious of the unreliability of the various accounts used in trial for Morris, this style of film shows "the nature of competing and conflicting evidence"

Now you can make any subject more engaging and memorable