Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM


Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.


A.J. Ayer - Paragraph C

No description

Lena Obiri-Yeboah

on 2 May 2014

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of A.J. Ayer - Paragraph C

Main Content
Paragraph 3 explains the idea of a personal 'God' beyond our observation is also untelligible.
- This doesn't make sense
- This 'God' cannot be verified.
- Suggestive that God is not a Genuine name.
Elaborate on Ayer's ideas of 'God being meaningless
- God is said to have super empirical attributes
- that is just associated with God's character
- However this notion in itself is of no meaning to us
because we cannot see or test for these attributes.
Link to other Scholars
Swinburne's aesthetic arguement
- 'Although A.J. Ayer suggests we cannot know of God directly through his association with the natural world. Other Scholars may refute that. Swinburne could argue that we could know of God's existence indirectly reflects the beauty and power of God' work.

Image by Tom Mooring
A.J. Ayer - Paragraph C
Ayer mainly uses this paragraph to explain how 'God' is not a real name. He likens it to suggesting that it the language is likned to natural objects (things within our realm we might mean something of that language. However this takes away from the true idea of 'God'. A true God runs from outside controlling nature than being a part of it.
However one that is beyond our observation is untelligible, rendering it meaningless.
Full transcript