Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

Halliburton Accounting Scandal

No description
by

Lucas Minato

on 24 June 2013

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Halliburton Accounting Scandal

¡Details!
What Happened?
What is Halliburton?
The Judicial Watch, representing shareholders filed a suit against Former Vice President Dick Cheney, 13 other directors, Halliburton Corp and Arthur Andersen, its accounting firm.
Based in Houston and Dubai, Halliburton is one of the largest oil companies in the world.
The company owns many subsidiaries, branches and units.
Making it a key player in the world economy.
Due to its many subsidiaries Halliburton's operations span the globe, employing over 100 000 people.
Halliburton's well known among the top oil companies in the world.
The Halliburton Accounting Scandal
Key Players
Defendants
Halliburton Company
Halliburton Energy Services
Richard B. Cheney
David J. Lesar
Ray L. Hunt
Robert L. Crandall
Charles J. Dibona
Lawrence S. Eagleburger
William R. Howell
James Landis Martin
Jay A. Precourt
Cecil J. Silas
Douglas L. Foshee
Jerry H. Blurton
Cedric Burgher
Robert Charles Muchmore, JR.
Andersen
Andersen Worldwide
Arthur Andersen, LLP
Terrence Edward Hatchett
Reasoning
Halliburton fails to notify investors and analyzers about
A number of schemes were built to anchor the health of the company's financial position, misleading people.
The scheme turns out to be a practice Halliburton uses to deceive the public.
Where the Case Stands today?
In 2002, Halliburton paid 6 million dollars to the plaintiffs who had requested 7.5 million. Halliburton mixed with many of its harmful schemes received poor public relations and had lost many loyal and trustworthy customers.
The Accounting Issues/GAAPs Involved
Many GAAPs were violated by Halliburton, such as:
The Objectivity Principle
The Consistency Principle
Convention of Conservatism
Revenue Recognition Principle
The Matching Principle
Full Disclosure Principle
The suit charges Halliburton with improper accounting practices and misguiding press releases effecting the overstated shares, meaning shareholder losses.
The lawsuit alleges the company inflated its revenue by $445 million USD through 1999 and 2001.
How They got Caught?
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) performed a formal investigation into Halliburton and uncovered the truth. Most companies are routinely audited throughout their fiscal period to ensure proper and trustworthy documentation and results.
Full transcript