Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
Transcript of Elizabeth Bouvia
Born in 1958
Right to Die Figure
Cerebral Palsy, Quadriplegic and Severe Degenerative Arthritis
Comfort measures: Pain medication and hygeine
Relief from a life lacking quality
Elizabeth's conditions imposed many physical disabilities:
Immobile and bedridden
Unable to care for herself
No form of financial income
Relying on Public Assistance
Forced to leave her parent's home when they could no longer care for her
Elizabeth's husband left her
Also graduated college, but unable to work
"Letting go of all burdens. It is being able to be free of my physical disabilities and mental struggle to live."
"It's not that I don't have the will to live, but it is too much of a struggle to live within the system or to depend on someone in the system. In reality, my disability is going to keep me from doing the living I want to do."
When Elizabeth's weight fell between 65 and 70 pounds, a nasogastric tube was inserted against Elizabeth's wishes and written instructions
Elizabeth Bouvia v. Riverside Hospital
The American Hospital Association (AHA) Policy and Statement of Patient's Choices of Treatment Options
Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs of the American Medical Association's statement of "Withholding or Withdrawing Life Prolonging Medical Treatment"
All persons have the right to terminate their life
The hospital's refusal to assist was discrimination
Refusing life-sustaining treatment is not suicide, but accepting death
Elizabeth Bouvia v. Riverside Hospital
Supported Through Analogy
Right to End Life???
My intent is to die..
I intend to starve myself to death...
Is Assisted Suicide Legal in the United States?
1983, Age 26, Riverside
1986, High Desert Hospital
Appellate Courts- Not State policy to preserve life
Trial Court, State should
Arguments: Refusal of Unwanted Medical Treatment
Removal of the NG Tube
A competent patient right to refuse any medical treatment, even if it may save or prolong his or her life.
Assistance required to eat constitutes as a medical treatment and she has the right to refuse
A patient's healthcare wishes should be honored
Binds the physician to provide care that promotes patient's well being, relief of suffering and preservation of life
**State prevails over Patient's Right to refuse treatment
Protect Innocent Third parties
Maintain Ethical Standards
Physician -Sustain Life/relieve suffering
Which Ethical Value Prevails?
Can they both work together??
What effect do you feel this case had on those involved?
Forced Tube Feedings
How do you think Elizabeth's stance effects stereotypes of disabilities?
What are some social effects that can
come from this case?
The court did note that Bouvia had no dependents, which would
support a finding that innocent parties would not be injured by Bouvia's
decision to refuse treatment.
States duty to preserve life is most signifiant
Fisher, L. J. (1987, November 1). The suicide trap: Bouvia v. Superior Court and the right torefuse medical treatment. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 21(1), 218-254.
Johnson, M. (1984). Right to life, fight to die: The Elizabeth Bouvia saga. Advocado Press. Retrived from: http://www.normemma.com/advocacy/artbouvia.htm
Liang, B., & Lin, L. (2005). Bouvia v. Superior Court: Quality of life matters. Virtual Mentor, 7(2). Retrieved from: http://virtualmentor.ama-assn.org/2005/02/hlaw1-0502.html
Stradly, B. (2010, September 7). Elizabeth Bouvia: v. Riverside Hospital: Suicide, Euthanasia, Murder: The line blurs. Golden Gate University Law Review, 15(2), 407-413.
Elizabeth Bouvia v. the Superior Court of Los Angeles County (225 Cal. Rptr. 297) 1986. Retrieved from: http://www.lawandbioethics.com/demo/Main/Media/Resources/Bouvia.htm
Right Not to Eat
How could this case effect
the hospitals mission?
Lehigh Valley Hospital
To heal, comfort, and care.......
Right not to Eat
Elizabeth Bouvia today??
NG TUBE STAYS
NG TUBE REMOVED