Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Transcript of Preference Utilitarianism
R.M Hare said "In this form if utilitarianism it is important to take into account the preferences of the individuals involved, except where those preferences come in to direct conflict with the preferences of others. The right thing to do therefore is to maximize the chance that everyone’s preferences will be satisfied."
Peter Singer said "the preference of the victim could sometimes be outweighed by the preferences of others", this shows that preference utilitarianism could sometimes support the killing of someone. But Singer still has a respect for the life of others, “a wide range of the most central and significant preferences a being can have". Singer also points out that people can be mistaken about what will make them happy but they are never mistaken about what they prefer. Founders Examples A good and simple example of preference utilitarianism is the cake example:
if my friends are all on diets and would prefer not to have cake, it would be more moral for me to eat it without sharing, according to preference utilitarianism.
A bit more complicated example is the gang violence example:
If a gang decided to rob and kill someone, then they would have more pleasure from killling the person and they would also have more money, which means that the gang have more pleasure after the person has been killed, than they did before, there are more people in the gang, so they would get more pleasure and by using preference utilitarianism this would be seen as the morally right thing to do as more people would be happy after killing one person Strengths Everyone's interests must be given equal consideration.
Makes the world a 'happier' place.
Practical and useful e.g if someone won the lottery, they would share it rather than keep it to themselves, this very useful to many other people.
Easy to apply to real life situations Hedonism (the pursuit of pleasure) is wrong- just because there are some people who enjoy a certain activity, it doesn't make that activity right. E.g, paedophilic pornography, it isn't right.
It is unpredictable, you might think it will help a lot of people, but something could change that would mean a lot of people would not benefit from it.
Incalculable- You could make a decision that does benefit a lot of people but could make matters worse for a lot more people with out even realising.
It is unfair to some people, it makes a lot of people happy, but you might have to cause suffering to innocent people, this is wrong. By Tessa and Eleanor. Preference Utilitarianism Chernobyl Disaster