Present Remotely
Send the link below via email or IM
Present to your audience
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Moving Forward With Program Reviews
Program Reviews
by
TweetKentucky Coordinated School Health
on 22 March 2017Transcript of Moving Forward With Program Reviews
photo (cc) Malte Sörensen @ flickr
Jamie Sparks
Kentucky Department of Education
Moving Forward With
Program Reviews
Where we are today?
History
Why Program Reviews?
Emphasis on...
Program Improvement
Pilot year for Program Reviews
2011-2012 State-wide field test
Summer 2012 - Adjustments to all 3 Program Reviews
2012-2013 - Baseline for Program Reviews and NGL for accountability
will tell each school what it needs in order to be labeled
Needs Improvement, Proficient, or Distinguished in 2014.
Schools will conduct a review of these programs in their schools using the ASSIST rubric
Calculated by dividing the number of graduates with diploma in 4 years + graduates with diploma but IEP allowed 4+ years by the 9th grade membership 07-08 + 10th grade membership 08-09 divided by 2
Calculated by dividing the number of graduates who met all readiness indicators with total number of graduates. Indicators of readiness are ACT performance, completion of college placement tests or attainment of industry certificate.
ACT
PLAN
EOC
MATH
READING
SCIENCE
SOCIAL
STUDIES
Budget
Accountability
PLCS
A & H
Writing
Accountability
Moving Forward...
Schools
PLCS,A & H,
Writing
Evidence
Support
Student
Production
Integration
English
Math
Science
Social Studies
Administration
Quality vs. Quantity
Where
Leads
the
Cuts
Road
K-3
2012-2013 - Field Test
2013-2014 - Accountability
World Language
2013-2014 - Pilot
2014-2015 - Field Test
2015-2016 - Accountability
Audits
School & Districts
Coaching & Monitoring
Programs
Teacher Effectiveness
Leadership &
Support
=
Student
Success
Created and provided by JCPS
Created and provided by JCPS
Created and provided by JCPS
Full transcriptJamie Sparks
Kentucky Department of Education
Moving Forward With
Program Reviews
Where we are today?
History
Why Program Reviews?
Emphasis on...
Program Improvement
Pilot year for Program Reviews
2011-2012 State-wide field test
Summer 2012 - Adjustments to all 3 Program Reviews
2012-2013 - Baseline for Program Reviews and NGL for accountability
will tell each school what it needs in order to be labeled
Needs Improvement, Proficient, or Distinguished in 2014.
Schools will conduct a review of these programs in their schools using the ASSIST rubric
Calculated by dividing the number of graduates with diploma in 4 years + graduates with diploma but IEP allowed 4+ years by the 9th grade membership 07-08 + 10th grade membership 08-09 divided by 2
Calculated by dividing the number of graduates who met all readiness indicators with total number of graduates. Indicators of readiness are ACT performance, completion of college placement tests or attainment of industry certificate.
ACT
PLAN
EOC
MATH
READING
SCIENCE
SOCIAL
STUDIES
Budget
Accountability
PLCS
A & H
Writing
Accountability
Moving Forward...
Schools
PLCS,A & H,
Writing
Evidence
Support
Student
Production
Integration
English
Math
Science
Social Studies
Administration
Quality vs. Quantity
Where
Leads
the
Cuts
Road
K-3
2012-2013 - Field Test
2013-2014 - Accountability
World Language
2013-2014 - Pilot
2014-2015 - Field Test
2015-2016 - Accountability
Audits
School & Districts
Coaching & Monitoring
Programs
Teacher Effectiveness
Leadership &
Support
=
Student
Success
Created and provided by JCPS
Created and provided by JCPS
Created and provided by JCPS