Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM


Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.



No description

Callie Wine

on 22 April 2014

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Thesis

July 2004:
Bill Passes in the House

October 2004
Signed into Law by
President Bush

Begin Research

September 2004:
Bill Passes in the Senate

United States House Resolution 4011: North Korean Human Rights Act of 2004
Politics of Policy Change:
United States Congress & Human Rights in the Democratic Peoples' Republic of Korea
Callie Rice,
BA Candidate '14 Lewis & Clark College
What factors influence a change in foreign policy?
Dependent Variable
Formal Change in Foreign Policy
formal change
: adoption of H.R. 4011
adoption of H.R. 4011
extends to mean “the adoption of and agreement to follow the protocols and meet the objectives therein.”
Theories & Hypotheses
Duties Beyond Borders (Stanley Hoffman, 2008)
Case Study
Congress passes unprecedented legislation changing the U.S. policy toward North Korean human rights with H.R. 4011
Research Questions
March 2004:
Bill Introduced in the House

Why did the United States adopt H.R. 4011 North Korean Human Rights Act of 2004?
Bait & Switch (Julie A. Mertus, 2004)
Media Influence (Piers Robinson, 2008)
The U.S. Congress passes an unprecedented bill to address human rights concerns in the DPRK during nuclear escalation on the Korean Peninsula. The bill commits funding and makes new establishments, but no progress.
Duties Beyond Borders
Media Influence
Bait & Switch
If a nation perceives itself to have duties to people beyond their domestic borders, then the nation will change their foreign policy toward other states in ways that reflect those obligations.
If the public consumed internationalist media about North Korean human rights violations, then it is more likely that the United States adopted House Resolution 4011: North Korean Human Rights Act of 2004 in response to media attention to the issue of North Korean human rights violations.
If the United States wants to gain access to the Democratic Peoples’ Republic of Korea’s nuclear activity, then they will bait the DPRK under the guise of foreign aid and switch their agenda upon gaining access.
High Level
of Support
Low Level of Support
Low Level of Support
Time Frames
Duties Beyond Borders: 2001-2013
Media Influence: 2002-2004
Bait & Switch: 2002-2004 + Review of Renewal Processes in 2008
Case Study
on Ye
Duties Beyond
Media Influence
Writing "positive" legislation for the campaign trail
Bush Doctrine is largely interventionist.

Coverage of political activity naturally increases with campaigning
Implications &
External Validity
The theory of Bait & Switch best explains my dependent variable.
My other two theories provide evidence for Bait & Switch as well:
*Now We're Reminiscing How We Used to Flex In Texas: How the Bush Administration Manipulated Human Rights Legislation into Security Gains
Typical Case

Challenges of Working With Rogue States
"Uses" of Human Rights Legislation
Bait & Switch
Illuminates challenges of implementing human rights policy objectives
Misuse of Congressional Legislation
pork barrel legislation, rider legislation, "Christmas tree legislation," omnibus legislation, etc.
Full transcript