Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
Mapp Vs. Ohio
Transcript of Mapp Vs. Ohio
Donald King house bombing (1957)
Unknown caller links bombing to Mapp's home.
Police ask to enter premises
Police Break in 3 hours later
Police takes in evidence illegally
Dollree is sent to court
Takes case to Supreme
Was the search of Mapp's home legal and the evidence admissible under State law and criminal procedure?
If the State criminal procedure code did not exclude the evidence as having been illegally gained, did Ohio law fail to provide Mapp her 4th Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures?
4th Amendment Violated
5-3 favor for Mapp
4th amendment was only used by the federal government.
- Search and Seizure
In favor of the Supreme courts decision.
Katz v. United States
Walter L. Greene
- Using a telephone inside a private telephone booth and being wiretapped by the FBI.
Beck v. Ohio
- Gaining a tip from an informant and charged from an unconstitutional search.
"To say that a government should be able to use unconstitutionally seize evidence because there is no fundamental prohibition against its use of evidence seized unlawfully by private persons, is to ignore the experience of ages. What can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, it disregard of the charter of its own existence?"