Solutions
Pricing
Log in
Teams
Get started
Log in
Get started
The Rogerian Argument Essay
SM
by
Simone McFarland
·
2 views
·
Updated Apr 27, 2021
Share
Embed
Re-use content
Create your own
Chapters
00:00
The Rogerian Argument Essay
00:18
Carl Rogers, who describes the method as a negotiation where both opposing parties compromises
00:58
1. Let the reader know they have been understood
01:04
Show the reader his/hers claims are valid to a certain degree
01:11
Show the reader that both parties share similar principles in significant ways
01:18
Propose solutions that have been created from elements from both parties
01:47
Traditional argument: One-sided No solution offered
02:13
Rogerian Argument: Offers solutions More of a dialogue
03:00
1. Avoid Conflict
03:16
2. Show empathy
03:28
3. Redirect
03:42
4. Be willing to change your views
04:13
Introduction: First paragraph State problem and solution
04:21
Summary of opposing views
04:44
Statement of understanding
04:57
Statement of position
05:17
Closing
Audio Transcript
Auto-generated
00:00 - 00:04
Yeah, I chose to re gary in argument essay only
00:04 - 00:05
because I struggle with the concept.
00:06 - 00:08
I find it quite easy to argue my own views
00:08 - 00:10
and standpoints, but I found it difficult to include someone
00:11 - 00:13
who opposes my views in my essay.
00:14 - 00:15
So let's go ahead and dive into the concept.
00:20 - 00:23
The inner workings of the Hungarian argument essay is derived
00:24 - 00:24
from the Hungarian method.
00:26 - 00:30
The recovery method is credited to psychiatrist Carl Carl Rogers.
00:30 - 00:33
Rogers describes the mess that method as a negotiation where
00:34 - 00:34
both parties compromise.
00:36 - 00:39
The method relies on one's ability to be sympathetic to
00:39 - 00:40
the opposing viewpoint.
00:42 - 00:44
The rig Aryan argument is a strategy in which common
00:45 - 00:46
ground can be obtained to reach an agreement.
00:47 - 00:49
The agreement is reached by discovering set common ground by
00:50 - 00:52
describing opposing views as a jet flee as possible.
00:54 - 00:58
in short, the 44 goals of the Bulgarian argument is
00:59 - 01:03
to one Let the reader know they have been understood
01:06 - 01:09
to show the reader his or hers claims are valid
01:10 - 01:10
to a certain degree.
01:13 - 01:16
Three showed a reader that both parties share similar principles
01:17 - 01:18
in significant ways.
01:19 - 01:23
Yeah. In four proposed solutions that have been created from
01:23 - 01:25
elements from both parties.
01:28 - 01:30
Using those goals can help one who's having difficulty writing
01:30 - 01:33
a rigorous argument essay to stay on the right path
01:33 - 01:36
and reach the end goal, which is to create solutions.
01:38 - 01:38
Okay. Mhm.
01:39 - 01:42
But what has a gregarious argument different from a traditional
01:42 - 01:44
argument? How can it be more productive than the traditional
01:45 - 01:49
argument? A traditional argument is more or less trying to
01:49 - 01:52
prove why your claim or your views are more valid
01:52 - 01:54
over the person who opposes your standpoint.
01:56 - 01:58
Traditional arguments tend to be one sided and nine times
01:58 - 01:59
out of 10 offer no solution.
02:00 - 02:03
Think of to politicians in different political parties who are
02:03 - 02:07
arguing that claims of immigration, neither wants to discredit their
02:08 - 02:10
own claim and hopes to become up coming out on
02:10 - 02:16
top of the argument once again, the re Gary in
02:16 - 02:19
states positive for both sides of the both sides of
02:19 - 02:22
the coin, crediting both claims and usually forming a solution.
02:23 - 02:26
Think of marriage counseling couples who go to counseling are
02:26 - 02:29
looking for solutions, solutions to approve the relationship and find
02:29 - 02:30
common ground.
02:30 - 02:33
They want to save their relationship before it gets to
02:33 - 02:33
the point where it's destructive.
02:37 - 02:40
The re Gary Inn offers a more constructive way of
02:40 - 02:40
handling an argument.
02:41 - 02:44
In the end, both parties can win, which is why
02:44 - 02:46
it can be seen as more productive than a traditional
02:47 - 02:48
where only one party comes out on top.
02:49 - 02:52
Usually it's a lot of confrontation and there's just no
02:52 - 02:52
real winner.
02:56 - 03:02
Remember when writing your Bulgarian essay argument essay two avoid
03:03 - 03:08
conflict, present yourself as un confrontational as possible, confrontation could
03:09 - 03:12
cause the opposite party to increase their defenses, thus closing
03:12 - 03:20
that line of open communication and active listening two show
03:20 - 03:23
empathy. Show that the goal is that your goal is
03:24 - 03:26
the same as you're a poser, which is just to
03:26 - 03:26
find a solution to the problem.
03:30 - 03:34
Three. Redirect if you notice that your argument is starting
03:34 - 03:37
to lean towards confrontation or you feel like it's sort
03:37 - 03:40
of going into a dead end, don't be afraid to
03:40 - 03:40
redirect to compromise.
03:44 - 03:49
Yeah, In four, be willing to change your views, show
03:50 - 03:52
your impose er that you are open to change.
03:53 - 03:54
And that's the point of this argument.
03:55 - 03:57
Point out where your position is not reasonable or where
03:58 - 03:59
it can be susceptible to change.
04:01 - 04:06
Mhm. When writing that essay, outlining your essay is something
04:06 - 04:09
that can help you keep the end goal which is
04:10 - 04:11
compromise in reach.
04:15 - 04:18
Your first paragraph will be your introduction there.
04:18 - 04:19
You will state the problem in your solution.
04:23 - 04:27
Your next paragraph or paragraphs depending on how far deep
04:27 - 04:29
into deep into the subject that you dive.
04:30 - 04:32
Will be your summary of opposing views.
04:33 - 04:34
Be neutral and be accurate.
04:35 - 04:37
Showed a reader that you have thoroughly researched their point.
04:38 - 04:41
Do not sound countess condescending and be open.
04:43 - 04:49
Yeah. Your next paragraph or paragraphs will be your statement
04:49 - 04:50
of understanding, empathize.
04:51 - 04:55
Show your understanding of their few of their viewpoints.
05:00 - 05:02
Next is the state statement of position.
05:02 - 05:05
And this is just where you stay or describe your
05:05 - 05:07
views, be as accurate as you were when you were
05:08 - 05:13
describing your opposers views and remember don't sound condescending and
05:13 - 05:13
be open.
05:14 - 05:15
The point of this is to be an open book
05:15 - 05:16
to reach a solution.
05:20 - 05:22
Your last paragraph will be your closing in your closing.
05:23 - 05:25
You will state how the reader will benefit from moving
05:25 - 05:26
forward with your standpoint.
05:27 - 05:32
But you also lay out possible ways to compromise or
05:32 - 05:36
alternative solutions to the problem once again remain neutral.
05:36 - 05:39
Show your willingness for solution and for change.
05:42 - 05:45
Learning about the re gary in argument essay was something
05:45 - 05:47
that was really new to me.
05:47 - 05:51
I've never came across the concept most of time in
05:52 - 05:54
school. You're sort of talk about debating in traditional debating,
05:55 - 05:59
and it's about stating your point and while you're right,
05:59 - 06:02
so it's nice to have learned about the Hungarian concept,
06:03 - 06:06
so you can know how to reach compromise without an
06:07 - 06:08
argument or confrontation or confrontation.
See full transcript