VISUAL ESSAY PART 2

by Isabela Diaz Marin·2 views·Updated May 9, 2024

PART 1 - Had to make it in two parts because the free version only allows for 15 min of presentation. https://prezi.com/v/view/PJi0EzZlHtziUTu281js/

Audio TranscriptAuto-generated

I am not.
Ok. Now, let's talk about counterarguments.
Um There are multiple counter arguments to refute this point of view.
And here are two.
First, we have
allogenic
and health risks to GMO
where um we defined allergy as a hypersensitive immune response that occurs
when a person comes into contact with these specific substances called allergens.
These allergies can lead to symptoms such as red eyes, itchy rash, swelling,
runny nose and breathing difficulties.
Currently, there's no evidence that GMO S cause allergies.
In fact,
researchers who develop GMO foods run tests to ensure that
allergens are not transferred from one food to another.
They have also shown that GM foods are not
more likely to trigger allergies than their non GMO compo
counterparts or components.
And to prove this,
a doctor in Harvard making noise conducted a study to address and
test many suspicious regarding the effects of GMO S on organ health,
offspring and DNA
that as we discussed, um we can find it here
where
um there's no relationship between GMO S and mutations and there's
no evidence for gene transfer between DM OS and consumers.
Um Fertility,
pregnancy and offspring are unaffected by DM Os and organ
health and function is unaffected by GMO S as well.
Now, we have also the labeling and implementing mandatory uh for GMO products.
Um This could be actually very costly and complex process.
Um Food manufacturers would need to track
and verify the presence of GMO ingredients
and update packaging. Comply with
um labeling relations and potentially leading to increase for
prices for consumers due to this whole process which
defeats the pro
defeats the purpose
defining clear price hold for GMO um content presents another challenge because um
determining which products should be labeled to trace amount of GMO S,
it's difficult even the diversity of GMO crops.
And
um it's very, very tense
rather than totally relying on labeled consumers to prioritize understanding
the rigorous risk assessment process
undertaken by regulatory agencies worldwide.
Some food companies already voluntarily labeled their
products as non GMO or GMO free,
allowing consumers to make informed choices based on their preferences.
Now, let's go to our conclusion.
And
um
introduction of GMO S in agriculture
represents a significant technological advancement,
offering various benefits across various domains.
Um Through precise genetic engineering techniques,
we find that GMO S have enabled the development of crops with in hazed
trades such as resistance to pest diseases
leading to improved crop yields and quality.
Also adopting GMO S fosters environmental sustainability
by reducing the need for chemical inputs.
As um mentioned before,
promoting conservation um conservation of tillage
practices and enabling cultivation in previously
unsustainable environments
and now economically GMO S contribute to higher farm incomes,
reduced production costs and enhanced livelihoods for farmers,
particularly in developing regions.
Now, despite concerns raised
regarding electricity and complexities of GMO S labeling
scientific data or evidence has consistently supports the
safety and benefits of genetically modified organisms.
Embracing GMO technology offers a
promising pathway towards sustainable agriculture
for security and economic prosperity in a global scale.
Now,
I'm sharing my works cited here
and thank you very much for watching.
And do you
say?