Oral Presentation

thank you, Sir Kong.

There's some assumptions that presented in this article.

One assumption meat is due to the fact that the

prediction models that created using the transform the past doesn't

mean any implementation off new protocols will affect the prediction.

Quoting from the article, one of the iconic climate models

and one of the first brought the issue of climate

change too broad Public attention was published by James Hansen

off NASA in 1988.

However, his predictions for temperatures after 1988 were 50% higher,

actually global mean temperatures in those years.

This is in part because Hansen did not anticipate the

Montreal Protocol, a treaty that went to effect in 1989

on which banker for all cupboards, which are both in

greenhouse gasses.

As you can see, the author has mentioned, such prediction,

models are not always correct.

In this case.

The prediction model published by Hanson overestimated the global mean

temperature due to the implementation off the Montreal Protocol.

The Montreal Protocol is an international agreement in 1987 when

it was designed to stop production and import ozone depleting

substances and reduce their concentration in the atmosphere to help

protect the Earth ozone layer.

Due to this, the actual value of greenhouse gasses was

actually less than what was estimated, resulting in a lower

mean temperature in the past few years.

Treaties such a security protocol in 2005 Paris agreement in

2016 have been implemented to cut human emission off the

greenhouse gasses.

Another assumption made is that there must know there must

be no drastic change in human mission.

Like I mentioned prediction models that created using trends from

the past.

A drastic change in human mission will result in the

prediction model being inaccurate.

Once again, that concludes the uncertainties assumptions.

Are we passing your time over to usually, who will

be liberating more on the implications and importance off this

Audio TranscriptAuto-generated