Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Loving v. Virginia
Transcript of Loving v. Virginia
"Whether a statutory scheme adopted by the State of Virginia to prevent marriages between persons solely on the basis of racial classﬁcations violates the
Due Process clause
"Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, Malay and red, and
he placed them on separate continents
And but for the interference with his arrangement there would be no cause for such marriages"
"Punishment for marriage is a felony and up to five years in confinement"
Leon M. Bazile
The Court held, "There can be no doubt that restricting the freedom to marry solely because of racial classifications violates the central meaning of the Equal Protection Clause"
Virginia's anti- miscegenation laws banned interracial marriage between Americans (Whites) and African Americans (Blacks).
State's legitimate purposes were, "To protect the racial integrity of its citizens", and to prevent the "
corruption of blood
a mongrel breed of citizens
By: Jordan Spasic
5 Years Later
Invalidated all other states anti-miscegenation laws in the United States (16 states)
Bolstered the same sex marriage equality movement
Mildred Jeter and Richard Loving
Married June, 1958, in the District of Columbia
Resided in Caroline County
In 1967, 16 out of 50 states had laws banning interracial marriage, only
49 years ago
Virginia's laws dated back to the Racial Integrity Act of 1924- absolute prohibition racial intermarriage.
"Leaving state to evade law"
Loving's were sentenced to 1 year in jail
Trial Judge suspended sentence for 25 years
Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy
American Civil Liberties Union
"The freedom to marry or not to marry, a person of another race resides with the individual, and cannot be infringed by the state"
Classified the right to marriage as a right, that can not be inferred upon by the state. (civil liberties)
Article 16 of UDHR- Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
Court found, the Virginian law had no legitimate purpose "independent of invidious racial discrimination"
Milestone in the fight against racial inequality