Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Roper v. Simmons
Transcript of Roper v. Simmons
At age 17 you are completely aware of what you are doing, especially if you do not have a mental disability, meaning that in my opinion the argument that you aren't fully sure of your actions, or your brain isn't fully developed before you are legally an adult is unreasonable. Simmons planned out his attack, he knew every single step of his crime before it was committed, and yet he is considered not old enough to know what he is doing.
Some might say that he should have been given the death penalty, but in my opinion, having to live with so much guilt, in terrible conditions, and knowing that it will never end, seems just as good of a punishment. I do not in any means think what Christopher Simmons did was okay, but i do think it is okay that he was not killed because of it. A. What Was Added to or Taken Away The decision of Roper v. Simmons (2005), has now made executing an offender under the age of 18 unconstitutional. B. Subsequent Case/s Stanford v. Kentucky Thompson v. Oklahoma Penry v. Lynaugh The petitioner (Roper) believed that Simmons was old enough to receive the death penalty, he also believed that the crime Simmons committed was severe enough to execute him. Simmons fought that Capital Punishment was unconstitutional because the age he committed his crime was less than 18. He said executing a minor would be against the eighth amendment, it would be a form of cruel and unusual punishment. A. Holding (what Supreme Court said) B. Holding (decision with reasoning) 1. Majority: The majority of the votes were for Simmons. There were 5 votes for Simmons, and 4 votes against. 2. Concurring: Justice John P. Stevens and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg wrote a concurring opinion, it said, "Perhaps even more important than our specific holding today is our reaffirmation of the basic principle that informs the Court’s interpretation of the Eighth Amendment. If the meaning of that Amendment had been frozen when it was originally drafted, it would impose no impediment to the execution of 7-year-old children today." 3. Dissenting: Justice Scalia, Chief Justice Rehnquist, Justice Thomas, and justice O’ Connor all wrote a dissent. They wrote about how maybe a national consensus had not been reached about the death penalty and minors because only 47% of states did not allow capital punishment to be given to minors. The court held that the Death Penalty could not be used on juvenile offenders. Thompson v. Oklahoma Annotated Bibliography
ROPER v. SIMMONS. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 21 May 2013. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2004/2004_03_633/>.
This is where i got most of my information for the project. I also found my primary sources on this website, they were links to the arguments and opinions of trial, and a recording of it. I would put the citation separately, but when you click the link, the arguments and opinions do not open up on a new tab, meaning they do not have a new web address.
"ROPER V. SIMMONS." ROPER V. SIMMONS. N.p., 13 Oct. 2004. Web. 21 May 2013. <http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-633.ZS.html>.
This website gave me information on my case. It helped me with details about why he was even accused for murder. It also helped me with learning about the Stanford v.Kentucky, a case that was similar to mine.
"U. S. Supreme Court: Roper v. Simmons, No. 03-633." Death Penalty Information Center. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 May 2013. <http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/u-s-supreme-court-roper-v-simmons-no-03-633>.
This website is where I found the direct quote from Justice Ginsberg and Justice Stevens. It also helped me learn more about the Holdings and the justice’s opinions.
PBS. PBS, n.d. Web. 21 May 2013. <http://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/teachers/lessonplans/socialstudies/juvenile_deathpenalty.html>.
I got information about my case from this website. It helped me understand a bit more of the defendant’s claims over the prosecution’s.
"Roper v. Simmons | Casebriefs." Casebriefs. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 May 2013. <http://www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/criminal-procedure/criminal-procedure-keyed-to-weinreb/sentence/roper-v-simmons-2/>.
This website helped me with knowing a little more about the death penalty. It helped me understand why some people believe in Capital Punishment and why others don’t.
"Roper v Simmons (2005)." Roper v Simmons (2005). N.p., n.d. Web. 21 May 2013. <http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/RopervSimmons.html>.
I learned more about my case at this website. It helped me with facts and the background of the crime Simmon’s committed.
"Roper v. Simmons." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 15 May 2013. Web. 21 May 2013. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roper_v._Simmons>.
Wikipedia helped me learn more about the background of my case and specific details about it. It also gave me links to some of the other websites I used. Even though Wikipedia is not a reliable resource, I made sure that every information that I took from the website was also on another website to backup what i had learned. I also went to the links on Wikipedia to make sure the information on there actually came from a real and trusted source.
"Interview Jeffrey Fagan." PBS. PBS, n.d. Web. 24 May 2013. <http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/whenkidsgetlife/interviews/fagan.html>.
This website was my favorite because it was an interview on someone who I came to believe is an expert on cruel and unusual punishment with minors. I got to hear a professional’s opinion on the case and about the eighth amendment and what it means to him, also his view on capital punishment given to minors. A Killer Case In Our Supreme Court