Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
The Pros and Cons of Monoculture
Transcript of The Pros and Cons of Monoculture
Generally crops that are commercially successful (IE: Russet Burbank Potatoes or Monsanto Soybeans) Cheaper, or mechanized labor
High productivity of commercially successful crops
Cheap production Pros of Monoculture Depletes nitrogen levels in soils
Diseases - no genetic variance between plants
Reliance on fossil fuels, chemicals, and technology
Less actual food being produced per acre of land
Displacement of local crops Cons of Monoculture http://macteeninterpreters.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/mono1.jpg http://conservingbiodiversity.yolasite.com/resources/soy_monoculture__Brazil.jpg Catastrophic crop failure unlikely due to genetic variance
Rotation of crops replaces nitrogen in soil
Pesticides and fertilizers not as necessary as different plant species and animals perform these functions
Multiple crops and markets
Short, Medium and Long term crops grown Polyculture More knowledge intensive
More difficult to mechanize, and therefor more 'expensive' Downsides Very commercially successful soybean crop in Argentina has led to:
Increase in toxicity of local environment
Displacement of indigenous people
Violent conflicts over land ownership Monsanto Approved Soy Monoculture in Argentina http://nature.berkeley.edu/~miguel-alt/modern_agriculture.html