Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
THE USE OF SMART BOARD IN TEACHING ENGLISH TO YOUNG LEARNERS
Transcript of THE USE OF SMART BOARD IN TEACHING ENGLISH TO YOUNG LEARNERS
How does the use of Smart Board in teaching English to young learners influence on student engagement in and perception of classroom activities?
Sünkür. M., Şanlı. Ö., Arabacı. İ. B., (2011).
Elementary school students’ views toward Smart Board practices. 5th International Computer and Instructional Technologies Symposium, 22-24 September, 2011 Firat Univesity, ELAZIĞ – TURKEY.
Beeland, W.D., Jr. (2002).
Student Engagement, Visual Learning and Technology: Can Interactive /Whiteboards Help? Retrieved, March 10, 2010.
Cox, A, (2010).
Smart Boards and Student Engagement. EdTECH 504, 2-13. Retrieved on March 17 from http://edtech2.boisestate.edu/coxa/Snythesis%20paper%20(504).pdf.
Sabo, H.M. (2001).
Use of Smart Board in Teaching Geography. Conference proceedings of “eLearning and Software for Education, 2, 184-188. Retrieved on March 12 from https://adlunap.ro/else_publications/papers/2011/1490_1.pdf.
Min. K., and Siegel. C. (2011)
. Integartion of Smart Board Technology and Effective Teaching. I-Manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, Volume 7, Number 1, June - August 201
Momentary time-sampling procedure
THE INFLUENCE OF SMART BOARD TECHNOLOGY ON STUDENT ENGAGEMENT IN AND PERCEPTION OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE CLASSROOM ACTIVITIES
MA Student: Ainur AITKUZHINOVA-ARSLAN
Advisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Eda ÜSTÜNEL
the influence of Smart Board technology
on young learners’
of classroom activities.
What are the students’ perceptions of lessons that include or exclude the Smart Board technology?
The percentage of on-task behavior was identified through observation during 40-minute English lessons in both first and fifth grade classrooms. Totally 12 English language lessons were monitored during research process in order to determine the influence of Smart Board technology on student engagement in and perception of classroom activities.
Smart Board technology can be used in the classroom in order to
increase student engagement
during the learning process;
The index of first graders' engagement and perception of classroom activities is
than fifth graders';
Fifth grade students learn and understand
much better without Smart Board
than with Smart Board;
did not use SB
in previous grades, that's why they need time to get used to new invention;
prefer typical blackboard
while studying new grammatical subject to Smart Board technology.
Beeland, W.D., Jr. (2002). Student Engagement, Visual Learning and Technology: Can Interactive /whiteboards Help? Retrieved, March 10, 2010, from http://schools.becta.org.uk/index.php?section=re&catcode=fitsprimary_formrid=11899
Charles, M. C. (2003). Piaget İlkeleri. Ankara.
Min. K., and Siegel. C. (2011). Integartion of Smart Board Technology and Effective Teaching. I-Manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, Volume 7, Number 1, June - August 2011.
Sünkür. M., Şanlı. Ö., Arabacı. İ. B., (2011). Elementary school students’ views toward Smart Board practices. 5th International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium, 22-24 September, 2011 Firat Univesity, ELAZIĞ – TURKEY.
To examine the
in first and fifth graders'
on-task and off-task
behaviors during 40-minute English lessons that include and exclude the use of Smart Board technology.
SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER STUDY
To examine the influence of Smart Board technology specifically on student
input and output skills
To identify the use of Smart Board technology at
other grade levels and subject areas
To investigate the effect of Smart Board technology on
students' performance at universities