Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

RHETORICAL FALLACIES

No description
by

Sheila Whittle

on 21 April 2014

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of RHETORICAL FALLACIES

RHETORICAL FALLACIES
Rhetorical Fallacies
An argument that is not sound (i.e. not valid, or based on solid facts), but may still be convincing.
Ad Hominem
Exaggeration
An overstatement or stretching the truth (taking the truth and making it more than it seems)
Three types of Rhetorical Fallacy:
Emotional Ads
1. Emotional Fallacy
Appeals to the audience's emotions or feelings

2. Ethical Fallacy
Bases the argument on the creator's character and authority

3. Logical Fallacy
Depends upon faulty logic or evidence

Ethical Ads
Logical Ads
Stereotyping
Categorical Claims
Appeals
In rhetoric, the means of persuasion in an argument. How you persuade your audience.

According to Aristotle, there are three
fundamental appeals to convince a person:
reason (logos)
ethics (ethos)
emotion (pathos)

Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"

A rhetorical fallacy where one side attacks the character or circumstance of the proponent (opposite side) of the position in order to distract from the argument.

This personal attack is intended to devalue the claim without regard for the evidence provided.

For example, consider
the following interchange:
Person A: It is important to give vaccines to children.
Person B: Of course you would say that. You are a nurse.
Person A: I provided research and evidence to support my opinion. Did you read that?
Person B: That doesn't matter. You are a nurse, and just like everyone else in the medical world, you are trying to make a buck.

A rhetorical fallacy in which one classifies a person or group according to a common aspect that is oversimplified, rigidly applied, and often uncomplimentary.

A rhetorical fallacy in which a claim is based often incorrectly on relating two things because they are in the same category.
Full transcript