Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
The problem of sex and intimacy in sex advice
Transcript of The problem of sex and intimacy in sex advice
Mediated Intimacy: Meg John Barker, Ros Gill, Laura Harvey
Study of sex advice media
Focus here: 65 sex advice books from past decade
Sex critical analysis (Downing, 2012)
Sex + intimacy framed as
Proposed 'solutions' restrictive and individualised
Sex Critical Sex Advice
The Sexual Imperative
Sex is necessary for individuals
Natural human need
Essential feature of identity
Vital for health & well-being
Sex is necessary for relationships
The 'glue' that holds them together
Sex better in loving relationships
Lack of sex -> break-up
Variations on PIV
Vary the positions for PIV intercourse
lack of penises or vaginas
Despite recognising the need for
external clitoral stimulation
vary costumes or locations
Spicing it Up
'Problem': Maintaining sex in intimate relationships
Assumed: 'sexless' relationships will end, being single is bad
Therefore reader requires expert to provide 'solutions'
Assumptions underlying the construction of sex + intimacy as a problem to be solved...
Resistances present across all sex advice, but:
Redrawing of lines, not dismantling hierarchy (Rubin, 1984)
'Alternative' books retain sexual imperative/individualisation
Perel (2007) de Botton (2012) illuminate 'problem'
Reading across books: diversity -> expanding imagination
Problem pages can destabilise normative assumptions
Rigid limits on context in which sex is acceptable
Image repetition: hetero monogamous couple
Non-monogamy excluded/warned against
Natural gender difference -> sexual problems
same-sex relationships no solution!
'Sex' = PIV -> orgasm
Perpetuated in structures of books
17% PIV (5% oral, 4% manual - 'foreplay')
Solo sex for practicing techniques
Bogeyman of the sexless relationship: You must work at sex
NOT: Asexuality, singledom/non-monogamy, discrepancy OK
Spice required to 'keep sex alive'
But in tightly policed boundaries
Question but reinforce normality
Fantasy / reality
Erotica / porn
Fun kink / risky BDSM
Individualised & responsibilised 'solutions'
No recognition of (social) role of sex advice in constructing templates
Sex critical advice possibilities
Diverse contexts for sex (expanding intimacy)
Normalising difference in amount/type of desire
Benign variation of bodies/practices (expanding sex)
Agency operating in social systems/structures
The Coital Imperative