Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Rock Group v. School Reporter -- Who will win?
Transcript of Rock Group v. School Reporter -- Who will win?
Does this reporter have a right to be that harsh? Does this fall under the 1st Amendment, or... ...is this libel? It is subjecting the band to ridicule and contempt, and most likely the loss of income because no one wants to come to their concerts after a bad review. So, to an extent, it is libelous. re·view |rivyoō|
a CRITICAL appraisal of a book, play, movie, etc., published in a newspaper or magazine. EXCEPT... ...it's in a review. In an objective article, this would indeed be considered libelous, but reviews are all about opinions. They are SUPPOSED to be critical. Our ruling? The reporter was protected by the fact that it is in a review, not an objective article. If the reporter had said that the concert was a ripoff or fraud instead of just "a waste of time and money", it would be defamatory. REPORTER WINS! (yay!)