Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

Untitled Prezi

No description
by

Nimbus 2000

on 2 November 2013

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Untitled Prezi

NIMBUS 2000
Length:98 cm
Width: 46 cm
Height: 107 cm
Arm Length: 39 cm
Materials:
Frame: Mostly wood, screws,
some PVC pipe.
Arm: Wood, duct tape,
lemon squeezer
Power: Rope, exercize bands
Decoration: Plastic netting,
spray paint, Plank
By: Tim Reid, Cameron Moran, Andrew Martin, and Cassandra Rojas
Distance | Height
1. 5.02 m | 1.29 m
2. 5.02 m | 1.28 m
3. 5.10 m | 1.30 m
4. 5.17 m | 1.29 m
5. 5.16 m | 1.29 m

Adverage Distance- 5.094m
Adverage Height- 1.29m
Cam's Math Circle
adv distance: 5.094 m
lololololol
Launch Velocity | Launch Angle
1. 7.04 m/s | 45.63°
2. 7.02 m/s | 45.52°
3. 7.09 m/s | 45.17°
4. 7.14 m/s | 44.77°
5. 7.13 m/s | 44.83°

Adverage Velocity- 7.08 m/s
Adverage Angle- 45.18°
Percent Error- 1.88%

Precision- 5.094 +/- .075
THE END
Conclusion

Errors:
- Our catapult was a little inaccurate because the position of the arm of the catapult was crooked.
-Our catapult was too big
- By ignoring air resistance, our calculations are off.

If we had stayed within the specifications of 1 cubic meter, our catapult would have been better. Also, to make the catapult better in the future, we could have made a better guidance system for the arm.

Summary:
Although the catapult was bigger than the specifications, our catapult performed very well in precision and accuracy. We were amazed by its performance and were happy about how it came out. This was a very fun project to work on.
Full transcript