Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
Pickering v. Board of Education
Transcript of Pickering v. Board of Education
Won Dissatisfied with the Board’s decision to terminate him, Pickering went to the Circuit Court of Will County to have the Board’s judgment reviewed. The Circuit Court, however, agreed with the Board’s decision based upon the notion that the letter was damaging to the welfare of the school. He then appealed his case before the Supreme Court of Illinois where they upheld the verdict of the Circuit Court. In 1968, Pickering pursued a review of his case in the United States Supreme Court. In an eight to one decision, the ruling of the Illinois Supreme Court was reversed. The United Sates Supreme Court decided that the statements made in Pickering’s
letters were within the realm of the First Amendment as well as any false statements
that were unknowingly made. The Court ruled that the State may not terminate
Pickering for making such declarations. Implication for
Education The First Amendment of the United States Constitution gives the right to freedom of expression. Included in freedom of expression is the element of freedom of speech; it gives individuals the right to articulate their ideas and opinions. It is vital for educators to be aware that the protection of the First Amendment right of the Constitution is not unlimited. Dismissal may be justifiable if the statements of an employee are detrimental to the operation of the school. Argued March 27, 1968
Decided June 3, 1968
391 U.S. 563