Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM


Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.


Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

Critical Discourse Analysis

No description

Victoria Zander

on 4 October 2013

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Critical Discourse Analysis

An overview
Critical Discourse Analysis
-Norman Fairclough's landmark publication of "
language and Power" (1989)
- Group of European scholars (Fairclough, Wodak, van Dijk, and others) form a CDA network. (1991)
- Goals of CDA group: critically embed texts in their social and political contexts, demystifying texts, denaturalizing the natural, putting texts (and processes involved in creating and reading them) into crisis.
- CDA vs CDS: Approach vs framework
Theoretical Roots
-Critical Theory (Frankfurt school, Habermas)
- Critical Linguistics, language can mystify (Kress, among others)
- Marxist or neo-marxist tradition, power, inequality, hegemony
- Foucault: The godfather of CDA
- also: anthropology, philosophy, rhetoric, text linguistics, socio-psychology, cognitive sciences, literary study, gender studies, sociolinguistics, and critical applied linguistics.
- Dell Hymes
- Focus: seek out social problems and to analyze them in a productive way, to problematize, denaturalize and to question the status quo.
- Important: Positioning of analyst. Analyst is never neutral in CDA, but takes a stance, is politically committed and is always part of discourse. It is not enough to uncover social inequalities, they also have to be evaluated morally and politically.
- In CDA, discourse is always a social constitutive practice that shapes social situations, realities,
practices, while at the same time being
shaped by them
Approaches and Key Scholars
Norman Fairclough: 3 dimensional framework:
(1) Discourse as text, (2)discourse as discursive practice, (3) discourse as social practice
- His work focuses on language, ideology, power, hegemony, politics and media discourse.
- examples:analysis of institutional, political and
capitalist discourses.

Ruth Wodak: Discourse-Historical approach (empahsizes context and background knowledge necessary for critical analysis)
- works on right wing populism
Approaches and Key Scholars
Teun van Dijk: Socio-cognitive approach (focuses on mental representations, and shared knowledge, beliefs and ideologies of language users; context as a subjective mental representation of a situation).
- works on politics and ideologies, denial of racism.

Gunther Kress; Theo van Leeuwen: Multimodal approach (language just another way of signifying, along with images, music, gestures, etc).

Other authors worth reading:
- Hill, J. H. (2008). The everyday language of white racism.
- Ramakrishnan, S. (2009). "Modernization of tradition": Contested discourses and negotiated ideologies of fairness, gender, and morality in the south indian media.
Strengths and Weaknesses of CDA
- Interdisciplinary
- accessible, flexible,
- allows for a convergence of fields of study
- takes a stance, analyst positions herself

-can be daunting, difficult to define
- difference between analysis, description, and interpretation? Bias?
- too linguistic? Not linguistic enough?

Toolkit with an attitude
Let's practice
Idea inspired by Dr. Srilakshmi Ramakrishnan's 2009 dissertation titled:
Cosmopolitan picture
Woman charged with killing boyfriend with stiletto heel

Ana Trujillo, 44, is charged with fatally stabbing her 59-year-old boyfriend following an argument at a bar.

HOUSTON — It started out as a normal night where Ana Trujillo and her boyfriend went out to a local Houston bar they often frequented. They enjoyed a couple bottles of wine and tossed back a few shots of tequila.

But the evening soured, she told police, after another man approached her at the bar. He offered to buy her a drink, angering her boyfriend, Alf Stefan Andersson, a respected professor and researcher at the University of Houston. The two argued and left the bar in a huff.

Yet how she became so incensed, or scared, that she wielded her stiletto shoe as a deadly weapon — repeatedly bashing Andersson with the heel, leaving him dead in a bloody crime scene — remains unclear. Trujillo maintains she acted in self-defense after Andersson became violent.
Full transcript