Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
Worker Allocation Models with Learning and Forgetting
Transcript of Worker Allocation Models with Learning and Forgetting
Learning and Forgetting ~ Austin Chacosky Pitcher 1st Base Tom Mark 40 65 72 Compare 87 2012 Roster # Name Position Tom Mark John Ruby Andy Jason Mike Cliff Benny 3 36 57 5 71 2 4 15 8 PITCHER 1ST BASE SHORT-STOP LEFT FIELD 3RD BASE RIGHT FIELD 2ND BASE CATCHER CENTER FIELD What if we take learning rate into account? Pitcher 1st Base Tom Mark 40 + 10 every game 65 + 9 every game 72 + 4 every game 87 + 2 every game Buffer 1 Task 4 Task 2 Task 3 Task 1 Buffer 2 Buffer 3 Work for a task is drawn from the buffer of the previous task in a work flow pattern Dr. David A. Nembhard and Bryan A. Norman created a model that incorporates learning and forgetting into worker assignment decisions Workers are assigned to task on a per period basis Productivity Work Period Workers learn as they perform tasks and their productivity increases as a function of their learning and forgetting characteristics and their starting productivity. 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 5 5 4 Productivity Work Period As the number of workers increases, the solve times increases exponentially 12 1 2 3 6 9 11 10 4 5 7 8 12 1 2 3 6 9 11 10 4 5 7 8 How to approximate learning and forgetting Solve for D for each worker
for each productivity levels ijk Assign workers to productivity levels when workers have been assign to a task D times Results: Drastic reductions in solve time while maintaining solution quality
Average objective value deviation of 4.06% Impacts of Research Tip Economic
Affluence This is a huge mountain Reduce planning time from hours to minutes
Increase management flexibilty to daily workforce absenteeism
Increased total productivity of workforce Questions? Worker allocation models:
assign the workers to tasks in an ideal way
organize a workforce
incourage high worker utilization LFCM