Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

Research Methods

No description
by

Rachelle Tannenbaum

on 6 February 2014

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Research Methods

Ask a Question
Form a Hypothesis
Collect Data
Analyze the Results
Draw Conclusions
What's the Purpose?
Descriptive
Correlational
Experimental
Define Your Variables
Variable:
The concepts or ideas being measured
Each variable will have multiple levels:
Operational Definitions
Choose a Sample
Choose a Method
Avoid Bias
A method of comparing two sets of data
The Scientific Method
Experimental Method
Observe a phenomenon and record it.
Look for statistical relationships between variables.
Can't prove cause and effect, but can definitely provide clues
Can help identify risk factors
Goal is to determine cause and effect
Differs from other methods because researchers actually manipulate (control) one or more variables
How is the variable being defined for purposes of the present study?
Example: Defining "happiness"
Asking a person to rate his own happiness
Asking a person's friends to rate his happiness
Measuring how frequently a person smiles
What's a Hypothesis?
Can be based on "common sense," observations, and/or the results of prior research
Occasionally researchers will raise general questions rather than making specific predictions
A specific prediction
Case Study
Surveys
Experiment
Studying one person in great depth
Advantages
Can study people in unusual circumstances
Richer data
Potential limitations
People may lie, forget, misremember
Interviewer bias
Hard to generalize to larger population
Advantages
Often quick and cheap
Can be anonymous
Includes written/web/oral surveys, questionnaires, tests, etc.
Potential limitations
Data is only as good as the answers you get
Response sets:
Certain groups may systematically distort answers
Ratings of others are subject to
halo and horns effects
Advantages
It's real behavior
Potential limitations
You don't know much about the subjects
Works best if they don't know they're being observed
Can only observe behavior, not thoughts
Ethics limit this method to public behavior
Advantages
The ONLY method that allows determination of cause and effect
Potential limitations
May sometimes be too artificial
Some variables cannot be manipulated
The researcher manipulates one variable to see if it leads to any changes in a second variable
1. Identify the IV and DV
2. Randomly
assign participants to groups
compare the DV for both groups
IV
DV
potential cause
potential effect
This is the one the researchers are manipulating
Chandon, P., & Wansink, B. (2007). The biasing health halos of fast-food restaurant health claims: Lower calorie estimates and higher side-dish consumption intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 301-314.

Which is healthier: McDonald’s or Subway?
The McSubway Study

Participants were given a coupon for either a McDonald’s Big Mac (600 calories) or a Subway 12-inch Italian BMT (900 calories)
Subway eaters were more likely to get bigger drinks, non-diet drinks, and cookies.
McDonald’s eaters underestimated their calorie consumption by 7%, Subway eaters by 52%.
Test Yourself!
Experimental Group
Control Group
Gets the new or different treatment
Gets the status quo
Goal is to avoid
systematic differences
between the two groups
We are looking to see if the groups'
average
scores are different
Are the Results Significant?
p value tells us the odds that the results are merely a fluke
Generally considered significant at p < .05
Statistical significance
vs.
Practical significance
What are the implications of the findings? Do they really mean anything?
Watch Out For "Balanced" Reporting!
Compile the Results of Multiple Studies
Replication is key
Reporters will give equal coverage to both sides of "controversial" topics, even when there's no real controversy
Are the Results Reported Accurately?
Confusing Correlation With Causation?
Misleading Graphs?
http://mediamatters.org/research/2012/10/01/a-history-of-dishonest-fox-charts/190225
Fox Business graphic showing what the wealthiest Americans in the top income tax bracket would pay if the Bush tax cuts were allowed to expire:
Same data, with a non-distorted Y axis:
Reliability and Validity
Reliability: Are the results consistent?
Validity: Does the test measure what it claims to measure?
Naturalistic Observation
Watching real-world behavior
Sampling Bias
Volunteer Bias
Experimenter Expectancy Effects
Demand Characteristics
Representative (unbiased) sample:
A sample in which there are no
systematic differences
between the sample and the larger population of interest
--http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/07/26/157899/fox-mnsbc-viewers-see-world-differently.html#.UehHO40p92A
Act Ethically
Informed Consent
People must be told in advance what they getting into
Confidentiality
Personal information cannot be revealed without permission
Freedom from Coercion
People cannot be forced to participate
Limited Deception
Only when necessary, and when the benefits outweigh the costs
3. Avoid confounds
Make sure the groups are treated the same in every possible way, except for the IV.
Placebo and nocebo effects
Then...
We can (sometimes) eliminate these by keeping participants and/or researchers "blind"
In the case of placebo effects, we can never eliminate them. But we can account for them by having a control group, which gives us a baseline for comparison.
Correlations
Positive correlation: As values of X go up, so do values of Y
Negative correlation: As values of X go up, values of Y go down
No correlation
Correlations can range from -1.0 to +1.0
Farther from zero = stronger relationship
Sign (+ or -) indicates the direction of the relationship
Three ways to explain a correlation:
Correlation Does Not Necessarily Mean Causation!
Income
Years in prison
Intelligence?
Impulse control?
Race?
1. A causes B
2. B causes A
3. There's a third variable that explains the relationship between A and B.
Measures of Central Tendency
Mean:
The mathematical average
Median:
The middle score
Mode:
The most frequent number
Sum of all scores
Total number of scores
1, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8
All three of these can be called "averages"
Employee salaries (in thousands)
10
10
10
40
50
60
900
Mean
Median
Mode
$154K (approx.)
$40K
$10K
There's always a fourth possibility:
The correlation might simply be a coincidence.
Watch Out for Illusory Correlations!
Did I dream about Aunt Mildred?
Did Aunt Mildred die?
YES
YES
NO
NO
--http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/correlation-or-causation-12012011-gfx.html
Variable
Levels
Hair color
Black, brown, red, etc.
Age
Older vs. younger
It only counts as a "variable" if there's variation within the study!
The measurement tool is not the same as the concept being measured.
If I give a survey about political beliefs, my variable is "political beliefs," not "a survey."
Variables should always be named using no more than a couple of words.
1. Identify the independent and dependent variables
IV
(Presumed) cause
DV
(Presumed) effect
This is the one that the researchers are manipulating.
--http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/anthony-weiner-hot-younger-women-poll-shows-article-1.1411771
The people who volunteer to be in a study may not represent the population
Researchers are people too! Biases may affect how they collect or interpret data.
Participants alter behavior based on what they think the researcher is looking for
Participants improve (or experience harm) due solely to expectations
Full transcript