Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

RDA for the non-cataloger 1

No description
by

Carrie Wallis

on 4 April 2013

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of RDA for the non-cataloger 1

Carrie Wallis
Sean Callihan
Mary Ann Abner RDA for Non-Catalogers Carrie Wallis
Acquisitions Librarian
Jessamine County Public Library Catalogs:
6 Degrees
of WORDS, MAKING UP Welcome to the FRamily Why Should I Care
About RDA? Jessamine County Public Library Librarians are often riveting conversationalists because of their overuse of acronyms and library jargon. Another powerful, yet often overlooked, professional conversation tool is that of the made-up word. The trick is to take a normal word and add a suffix or two to it.

An example: find + able + ity = findability.

Can you find this word in a dictionary? No, it has no findability.

A Librarian’s Guide to Etiquette, 2006
http://libetiquette.blogspot.com/ Words, Making up RDA FRBR FRAD FRSAR Resource Description & Access Functional
Requirements
for
Bibliographic
Records Functional
Requirements
for
Authority
Data Funcational
Requirements
for
Subject
Authority
Data RDA Basics New cataloging content standard (rules) based on FRBR and FRAD (conceptual models)
2002: – AACR3 work begins

2005: – AACR3 changed to RDA

2008: – Full draft of RDA

2010: – RDA released, records created and testing begins

2013: – RDA is here  

Future:– BIBFRAME, Linked Data??? Timeline Not just for “Anglo-Americans” and not just for libraries A tool that addresses
cataloging all types
of content and media Designed to be used
online RDA records can co-exist with AACR2 records Successor to Anglo-American Cataloging Rules, 2nd ed., 1978 (AACR2) Aunt FRBR & Uncle FRAD
(FRBR’s User Needs)
1. Find
2. Identify
3. Select
4. Obtain Offer structure for organizing bibliographic and authority information based on user needs Provide precise vocabularies to lend clarity to cataloging rules Stress relationships & linking Allow for the emergence
of new data forms Conceptual models that ... W
E
M
I The essence of FRBR (take it or leave it) W
E
M
I FRBR Inspired Catalogs OCLC LibraryThing JCPL Catalog
(Non-FRBRized) Limitations on RDA
Developed in the 1960's, MARC has been tweaked to accomdated RDA but is really meant for AACR2
As long the ILS remains grounded in flat MARC records, library data will be kept in their stand-alone silos The forty-five-year-old MARC
format, currently at version
MARC21, is an obvious barrier
to the provision of library
services in a web-based environment.

There is a growing consensus that
the time has come for libraries to
move to a new format. ~Karen Coyle
MARC21 as Data: A Start
Code4Lib Journal
Issue 14, 2011-07-25 Remind me why again? Increased Findability To be not only on the Web, but of the Web (Karen Coyle) "RDA provides a bridge from
our current environment to
new data structures, but some
of the benefits are not
going to be realized in our
current systems."
~Lori Robare
Univ. of Oregon
Libraries Library Catalogs Collection of MARC records (Up until now) Built on AACR2, 1978 revision (Anglo-American Cataloging Rules) Text records intended for people to read Online catalog still resembles the catalog card Then Now Links! More Works Relationships The Library of Congress has launched a review of the bibliographic framework to better accommodate future needs. A major focus of the initiative will be to determine a transition path for the MARC 21 exchange format in order to reap the benefits of newer technology while preserving a robust data exchange that has supported resource sharing and cataloging cost savings in recent decades. BIBFRAME
Full transcript