Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
" Yes, too often." by Kay S. Hymowitz
Transcript of " Yes, too often." by Kay S. Hymowitz
MAIDS / GSP 2014 - Globalization and Development in the Asia Pacific
Beyond the US/Westerners' nose
Morality preservation as main perspective
Free market fosters novelties/change
Actually entails both threats AND opportunities
Rather than solely "free market":
Neoliberal thoughts/processes (economical, social, political, cultural areas)
Unchallenged (self-)cannibalisation of moral infrastructure: other actors?
Newborn religions and myths & contemporary relevance of existing creeds
Underlying (only hinted) feminist discourse:
(single) mothers in charge of increasingly difficult children's moral socialization
Surrogates & Umbilical cords:
extra-curricular courses, tutors, babysitters ...
phones, instant messaging, GPS, etc.
Knowledge economy & protestant ethics influence
Worsening inequality/poverty (weaker cultural assets)
Education systems (esp. College) to be revised
Family-based formation of morality:
Strong family & cultural conspiracy of moral teachers
Moral socialization / emotions (sympathy, guilt)
Market corroded the power of the family:
cars (distances, "brothel on wheels")
TV & internet ("latchkey child", domestic gatekeeper - mothers - bypass)
Three ways in which market economies weaken morality socialization:
a. Introduction of novelty of change, challenging the established order
b. Sparking individual desire, challenging self-discipline and moral obligations
c. Treating children as autonomous, pseudo-adults (not an immature dependent)
Summary (PT 1)
Khop Khun Khrap!
Khop Khun Kha!
Andrea Cangialosi, Hkwan Ja Aung, Nico Hoffmann & Ni Ni Win
Outcomes: hedonism, materialism and anarchic egoism; increased anonymity
Summary (PT II)
Not only bad news!
Changing established moral rules = general threat. Really?
Moral character only exists in perspective.
Are we missing the point?
Checks-and-balances to counter endangered morality.
Hymnowitz, K. S. (2008): Yes, too often. In: Does the free market corrode moral character? West Conshohocen, PA: John Templeton Foundation. www.templeton.org/market