Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
There is Nothing New About Sociomateriality
Transcript of There is Nothing New About Sociomateriality
Technology is understood as part of the complex process through which organization is accomplished. Nabil, Orla, Faye, & Gillian (4.9% of articles) Roadmap Research on Technology and Organizations: Two Streams MISO1: Information Systems Innovation and Organizational Change
Critique A: There is nothing new about Sociomateriality Potential Solution:
Usefulness through Synthesis Critique B: Danger of Reification, Empirical Difficulties Potential Solution:
Multidimensional Framework Critique C:
Missing Links Potential Solution:
Inclusion of Other Elements “others will need to judge it on the basis of their own criteria and experiences"
-Wanda Orlikowski 2 3 4 5 Research
Stream I: Research
Stream II: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Source: Facebook Source: Cambridge Judge Business School Source: Orlikowski & Scott (2008) Source: Orlikowski & Scott (2008) Source: Orlikowski & Scott (2008) What remains unquestioned is the assumption that technology and humans (or organizations) are separate in the first place. Source: Faulkner & Runde (2012), Orlikowski (2007), Orlikowski & Scott (2008), Shotter (2011) 1. Historic Background
2. Research Streams
3. Sociomateriality: Main Tenets
5. Potential Solutions Discussion Questions 1) Is there room for refinement of sociomateriality or is the whole perspective a misguided misadventure?
2) While sociomateriality may be useful theoretically, does it produce useful empirical research?
3) Does additionally incorporating elements into a sociomateriality lens confound further research possibilities? 15 References