Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
AP Psych Project: The Monster Study
Transcript of AP Psych Project: The Monster Study
Research Method: Impose positive speech therapy with a control group and impose negative speech therapy with an experimental group
Subjects: Out of the 256 children examined, 22 children chosen from the orphanage in Davenport, Iowa
Control Group: 10 children with a stutter
Experimental Group: 12 children with normal speech Testing: Those in the control group were consoled and forgiven when a mistake was made in speech, but those in the experimental group were berated and labeled as having a speech impediment "Don't speak unless you can speak correctly. Watch your speech all the time. Do anything to keep from stuttering.'' "Take a breath before you say the word if you think you're going to stutter on it. Stop and start over if you stutter." Results: The experimental group showed extreme changes in speech from the very first session. Normal speech became difficult and many barely spoke at all by the end of the experiment. Due to the label given to them, many were ridiculed by others, and many carried the impediments for the rest of their lives. "Their speech became jerky and hesitant, and they covered their face and slid down in their chair during the sessions, according to Tudor's records." "12-year-old Phillip Spieker saw his grades plummet because he became afraid to talk in class. It's almost impossible to get the boy to speak in a situation other than play.'' "You destroyed my life. I could have been a scientist, archeaologist or even president. In stead I became a pityful stutter. The kids made fun of me, my grades fell off, I felt stupid. Clear into my adulthood, I still want to avoid people to this day.'' Implications: The research used in the 1939 study is considered highly unethical in today's standards. Wendell was one to the first to imply that speech impediments were cause by learned behavior attributed by external sources, which shed light onto new research on genetic and biological factors as well