Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Transcript of Civil Inattention
1. At what distance do the subjects tend to avert their gaze?
2. Is there a significant difference between results of male subjects and female subjects?
3. What additional behaviors were present in civil inattention?
4. How will our results compare with the 1978 study? Method Study 1: Letterman Lobby from 10:30 am to 11 am
Male-Male, Female-Female, Male-female
Polite smile, avoidant gaze, lowered head, other Pilot Test Study 2: Bracken Library from 1:45 to 2:30 pm
Male-Male, Female-Female, Male-Female
Ground marked with chalk for scale Study 3: 2 Confederates
Lower head or keep a level gaze
Observed behaviors of pedestrians Limitations •The Study we replicated used a camera to record the interactions
•By using a Camera in the 1978 study, the distance Study was easier to complete
•Goffman focused on middle-class adults when studying the rule of civil inattention Goffman’s rule of civil inattention be present when pedestrian passing occurs between students of Ball State University.
independent variable: the behaviors of civil inattention
dependent variable: college students. Hypothesis George Herbert Mead
Believes that people communicate through symbols Symbolic Interaction Theory Charles Berger
believes that when individuals are in times of uncertainty they attempt to reduce uncertainty by increasing predictability Uncertainty Reduction Theory Expectation Violation Theory Judee Burgoon
believes that people naturally have expectations and what happens when someone violates them Letterman Polite smile Avoidant Gaze Downward Glance Other Distances Literature Review Does Civil Inattention Exist in Pedestrian Passing? by Mark S. Cary 1978, from Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Testing Goffman’s Example
•2 filmed pedestrians
•1 used slides and “raters”
•1 used confederate passing
Proved inconclusive in finding significant proof of Goffman’s example and difference in male and female behaviors. The Goffman Rule: A Passing Fancy?
in Science News, 1979 Summarizes the Cary article but focuses on Cary’s inconsistencies and faulty observation methods.
Urges Goffman’s Rule to still be considered legitimate.
On Doing Being a Stranger: The Practical Constitution of Civil Inattention
by Stefan Hirschauer 2005, from Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
Applies civil inattention to elevator use, hearkens back to Goffman’s original study.
Concepts of gaze similar in pedestrian passing and elevators. Through a Glass Darkly: Effects of Smiling and Visibility on Recognition and Avoidance in Passing Encounters
by Miles L. Patterson and Mark E. Tubbs 2005, from Western Journal of Communication
Replicates a confederate passing study similar to Cary’s.
Focuses on specific pedestrian passing reactions and confederate use of sunglasses effecting civil inattention. Conclusion