Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

Miranda v. Arizona

Summary of the Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court case.
by

Mya Hardiman

on 7 February 2011

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Miranda v. Arizona

Miranda v. Arizona Miranda v. Arizona occured in 1966. A man named Ernesto Miranda was accused of kidnapping and rape. In court, the police did not warn him of his rights The right to consult his lawyer the right to remain silent the court used his confession and it lead to an unfair trial. the court did not warn him off his rights Doing so vilolated the fifth amendment. No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. the court deciced to make a new
law based on the case. A law called the "Miranda Warning" You have the right to remain silent; that anything you say may be used as evidence against you; that you may request the presence of an attorney, either retained by you or appointed by the court; and that you have the right, even after beginning to answer questions, to stop answering or request an attorney. Due to the new law, Miranda was found not guilty by the court. The Supreme Court closed the case, and Miranda did not nave to go to jail since his unjust treatment. Everybody desevres their rights, why not you? :-)
Full transcript