Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM


Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.


ODDC Evaluation Webinar

No description

Elise Montano

on 11 September 2014

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of ODDC Evaluation Webinar

Phase I Completed - how has it gone?
Capacity Building for Open Data Research
Lessons Learned from an Evaluation of the Open Data in Developing Countries Research Network
WF commissioned 2 independent evaluations

January - August 2014

Developed an M&E Framework

Conducted a Process Evaluation

Conducted an Outcome Evaluation
Process Evaluation

February - April 2014
Surveys and Interviews with Partners and Mentors
: is ODDC meeting the needs of research partners and mentors?
: how effectively is the WF managing the network?
: how efficient is management of the network?
: what is the impact of the network on members?
: what are the major influences for the sustainability of the network?

Outcome Evaluation

May - July 2014
Surveys and Interviews, document analysis and external input
Relevance - were activities & outputs consistent with objectives?
Effective - were activities & outputs realised?
Efficiency - Where objectives achieved on time & in a cost efficient manner?
Impact - what have been the real world changes and how has it built capacity?
Sustainability - are the results sustainable beyond the project timeframe?
ODDC Objectives in Short
17 partners from the Global South
12 countries
Academic Institutions, NGOs, research consultancies and independent researchers
Some highly knowledgeable about social research, but not open data, others vice versa
The Web Foundation
"on-demand" support in designing research proposals
periodic content support on open data concepts

Project (Partner) Management
Strong leadership & steering from WF
High enthusiasm for maintaining network structure
Partners play a passive role in running network and WF continues as main driver

Time and geography are still important in 'virtual' space
Set clear expectations about commitments for all parties
Mentoring is more rewarding for both sides when involvement is regular
Lessons Learned
At onset, networks need a leader/driver to invest significant time
Face to face meetings build trust and buy-in to larger network
Inherent tendency to cluster in regional/national subgroups
(Over time) a strong brand can help solidify membership and external representation
Research Projects Can have Lasting Effects on Capacity by:
Building knowledge, skills and familiarity with (new) technical concepts
Build Confidence to engage in global debates, engage stakeholders and take on new work
Connecting individuals to global and local knowledge & policy networks
Build and sustain enthusiasm for new topics
explore how OD promotes development

support knowledge sharing

build capacity in developing countries for working with open data issues
The Research Partners
Discussion Questions?
Via IDRC, the WF provided funding for a project:
The WF built a network including
researchers in developing countries
Open data research experts (mentors)

to carry out project objectives over a 2.5 year time frame
conducting case study research
building capacity for data collection and analysis
engaging global and local policymaking and practice
To explore the emerging impacts of open data on development and help explain if and how open data is bringing change to developing countries
+/-8 Mentors (group
composition changed)

Academics, specialists in
research of open data and/or
social research

Guidance on research proposals and methodological issues

Focal point of project
Mentorship, project administration, overall project and research guidance
1 research coordinator +1 programme manager + 2 part time managerial and admin support
Very strong support for and appreciation of mentor role as a support function for building capacity
So what are the main successful elements of the ODDC project (so far) and what have been the biggest lessons learned?
Lessons Learned
Overall lack of clarity about the scope of the mentor's role, despite guidance from WF
Result: frustration, confusion, disengagement and some dissatisfaction
The more mentors were engaged, the more projects benefited (knowledge, capacity, networks)
17 partners with separate budgets, research deliverable and timelines
Most results were delivered on time (but with strong push from WF)

Financial Administration
WF and for Partner Institutions
(difficulty and delays when payments go through multiple institutions)
Delivery of outputs
Set more internal milestones and checkpoints to ensure work is on track
design intervention plans where expectations are not being met
Building a Cohesive Network
Lessons Learned
Results: Capacity Building
How can these lessons be applied in other (current) projects?
What sort of systems of tools could be used to ensure future projects benefit from the lessons learned and recommendations of the ODDC network? How can learning become embedded in the WF's approach to programming?
What would be your recommendations for how the ODDC network can be sustained with minimal resources in the future?
Full transcript