Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM


Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.


12 Angry Men, Juror 10

No description

Dillon Hammond

on 21 April 2014

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of 12 Angry Men, Juror 10

We challenge Juror 10's point of view because it is based solely on personal prejudice, not the evidence from the case.
Character roles

~never had his own ideas
~shot down other people
~bias made him close-minded
~didn't see the purpose of details
~moved conversation along
~promoted idea of calling "hung jury"
speaks very loudly and dramatically
complains frequently
emotional appeal
And Nonverbal Communication
sick (blows his nose)
walks around and stands while speaking
dramatic hand motions and facial features
Delivery Skills
powerful voice
always yelling and raising his voice
can't sit still
commands attention, but over dramatic
ad hominem
12 Angry Men
Lillian, Kathryn, Brendan, Dillon
Consensus, Conformity, or Compromise?
Juror 10's steps to consensus...
he insulted every juror
Realized he was racist & prejudiced
took time by himself to reflect
Agreed with others at the end
Juror 10: the man with a summer cold
Works Cited
12 Angry Men.
Digital Image.
Web. 20 Apr. 2014.

Juror 10.
Digital image.
12 Angry Men - GGCA English.
Web. 15 Apr. 2014.

Revisiting 12 Angry Men.
Digital image.
Web. 15 Apr. 2014.

Full transcript