Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
Decision-Making Flowchart at California Community Colleges
Transcript of Decision-Making Flowchart at California Community Colleges
"1) curriculum, including establishing prerequisites and placing courses with disciplines;
2) degree and certificate requirements
3) grading policies;
4) educational program development;
5) standards or policies regarding student preparation and success;
6) district and college governance structures, as related to faculty roles: 7) faculty roles and involvement in accreditation processes, including self-study and annual reports;
8) policies for faculty professional development activities;
9) processes for program review
10) processes for institutional planning and budget development; and
11) other academic and professional matters as are mutually agreed upon between the governing board and the academic senate." Maybe Yes, it is ten-plus-one No Might your academic senate (or for a multi-campus district, any of your academic senates), claim that the issue is a ten-plus-one matter? Yes/Maybe No Which of the two process options did the district trustees previously decide to use for this type of ten-plus-one matter? "[R]elying primarily upon the advice and judgment of the academic senate" (or senates) "[A]greeing that the district governing board, or such representatives as it may designate, and the representatives of the academic senate shall have the obligation to reach mutual agreement by written resolution, regulation, or policy of the governing board effectuating such recommendations." The issue involves multiple categories that trigger both methods Split up the issue, or negotiate a process with the academic senate(s) Is the academic senate addressing the issue expeditiously? Yes No Yes Do you agree with the senate's recommendation? No Is this an exceptional circumstance, and do you have a compelling reason for not agreeing with the academic senate's perspective (or its failure to act)? You may use your best judgment in seeking input and making a decision Use the "rely primarily" process Use the "mutual agreement" process Yes No You may adopt or implement the senate's recommendation You may use your best judgment. Be prepared to litigate the question of whether the situation is actually "exceptional" and your reasons "compelling." You must show that you "normally" accept the senate's recommendations. You must accept the senate's recommendation or its lack of attention to the issue. The "rely primarily" process Yes No Are you able to work out a solution that the academic senate will support? You may adopt or implement the revised policies or programs Does a failure to act expose the district to legal liability or cause substantial fiscal hardship, and are there compelling legal, fiscal or organizational reasons for acting? Yes No Give up, try again, or await a crisis. You may act despite the lack of support from the academic senate. Be prepared to litigate the question of liability, fiscal hardship, and compelling reasons. The "mutual agreement" process Is the question of decision-making authority worth a legal battle? Yes No