Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM


Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.


2015-2016 Topic Lecture

No description

Kurt Fifelski

on 8 June 2015

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of 2015-2016 Topic Lecture

2015-2016 Topic Lecture

The Resolution
Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially curtail its domestic surveillance.
Other forms of surveillance
Supreme Court Cases & Laws
It all changes
Constitutional Amendments
4th Amendment
Exigent Circumstances & Plain View
-Mincey v Arizona (1977) establishes exigent circumstances

-Horton v California (1989) establishes plain view
FISA 1978
-Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
-Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court
Kurt Fifelski, University of Michigan
The Components
United States federal government
substantially curtail
domestic surveillance.
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
Katz v. United States (1967)
Defines legitimate expectation:
-independent magistrate
-describe search
-the location of the search
-reasons behind it

-All arrests are 4th Amendment events

-All persons have a “legitimate expectation of privacy”
Domestic Surveillance Post-9/11
Executive Order 12333

PATRIOT ACT - Sections 203, 212,

-In 2002 the NSA reached out to Telecoms, granting them access to over 81% of telephone data

-By 2003 they were recording telephone data on most AT&T Costumers

-The FBI & CIA were fully involved in data analysis in 2004

-2006, the Dragnet begins
-2007, Bush signs the Protect America Act
-2008, Bush signs the
2012, Edward Snowden
-Ends the collection of phone metadata
-Maintains roving wiretap & lone wolf provision
-Does not address foreign internet content collection

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,[a] against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
1st Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
The 14th Amendment
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
The Border Exception
-Little 4th Amendment protection within 100 miles of the border
-2/3 of the US population covered
-9/10 of the biggest cities
-4th Amendment
-Drones Abroad
Impose a restriction on
The United States Federal Government
Domestic Surveillance
“the focused, systematic and routine attention to personal details for the purposes of influence, management, protection or direction”
Full transcript