Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM


Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.


Couette Flow

Àlex March Vidal & Oriol Esteban Timoneda - UPC AEROSPACE, Fluid Mechanics

Oriol Esteban

on 11 June 2013

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Couette Flow

The objective of this practice is to study the horizontal velocity profile between two solid plates.

We will study different situations, like:
One plate moving.
Both plates moving.
Both plates moving in different directions.
Different types of fluid.

For each situation we will establish specific conclusions
Couette flow
Àlex March Vidal
Oriol Esteban Timoneda

This is a picture of an horizontal velocity profile between two plates, also known as Couette flow.

Our study will only have one difference respect to Couette flow: the conditions WON'T be STACIONARY.

What are we talking about
Methods & Results
Analytical method
Conclusions & Error
ERROR between the analytical solution and the numerical one
Fluid Mechanics – Francesca Ribas
UPC Aerospace

What equations we use
The equations used for solving our problem will be the Continuity and Navier-Stokes equations.

We will work in 2D, so we will only consider the velocity on the X direction, and will depend on Y (u(y)).

Regarding the moment equation, we will only consider this equation in the X direction, because the other moment equations regarding the other directions will be NEGLIGIBLE or VANISHED.

What is Couette flow
Who was Couette
We can solve the problem analitically, calculating the velocity profile. For that reason, we will have to consider stationary conditions, to simplify the equation.

This analytical resolution will allow us check if our numerical solution is correct with a minimum of precision.

In fluid dynamics, Couette flow is the laminar flow of a viscous fluid in the space between two parallel plates, one of which is moving relative to the other.

The flow is driven by virtue of viscous drag force acting on the fluid and the applied pressure gradient parallel to the plates.

This type of flow is named in honor of Maurice Marie Alfred Couette, a Professor of Physics at the French university of Angers in the late 19th century.
For solving the velocity profile in a simple and fast way, we will use discretization with finite differences.

By the left side of the equation we will use the forward derivative, and for the right side the central derivative.

Using the numerical method, we can consider NON stationary conditions, because that fact don’t make our way of resolution harder to solve.
Numerical method
Upper plate moving
In this case we can see the velocity profile corresponding to the upper plate moving.

Lower plate moving
In this case we can see the velocity profile corresponding to the lower plate moving.

Both plates moving
In this case, both were moving at the same direction (and same speed), so the velocity profile tends to be uniform, like the steady case (red line) shows.

Both plates moving in different directions
In this case, both were moving at the same direction (and same speed), so the velocity profile tends to be uniform, like the steady case (red line) shows.

Ethylene Glycol
In our case we used these fluids:
Ethylene Glycol
x 9
Ethylene Glycol
x 9
x 16
Upper plate moving
Upper plate moving
(Ethylene Glycol)
In this case, we can see that the Honey velocity evolution varies a lot with SAE 30W OIL. The high viscosity forces all the fluid to move at a time.

On the other side, the Ethylene Glycol velocity evolution also varies because its viscosity is lower. So the fluid velocity only changes on the closer part of the wall (moving one).

Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy condition
What is this condition?
Is a necessary condition for convergence while solving certain partial differential equations
9'4 · E^-3
Ethylene Glycol Case
= 2% ~ 0'0006
For calculating the error we have taken the velocity in the middle point, at the final time. That means our numerical solution is almost stationary, like our analytical.
3,46% error
One plate moving: Analytical 0,5 Numerical 0,4827
3,45% error
Both same direction: Analytical 1 Numerical 0,9655
3,46% error
Both diff. direction: Analytical 0,5 Numerical 0,4827

~3'46% APROX.
As a conclusion to our project and after doing all the tests, we can say that:

In order to properly display the full velocity profile, we would have to tend to infinite, which is "equal" to a lot of iterations.

With only 100 iterations, our results were not very different from the steady ones at the last iteration (error of 3,46%, like we have seen).

The numerical methods really help us with the solution of a very difficult analytic problem, simplifying it to just a few equations and operations.

Thanks for your attention
Full transcript