Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

CARP - Evaluating Websites for Research

No description
by

Catherine Davila

on 23 March 2013

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of CARP - Evaluating Websites for Research

C.A.R.P. Evaluating Websites What?! No Wikipedia!? Mrs. Daaavilaaa! Mrs. Buuuurrrdick! Why evaluate my sources? Best Websites to Use Currency Authority Evaluating Websites Reliability The web is not formally organized.
No formal evaluating process to decide what goes on the web.
Anyone can create a page on any topic, regardless of their qualifications.
Authors can remain anonymous. Look primarily for websites ending in .edu, or .gov.
These domains can only be had one it is proven the owner is an educational institution or a government.
A proven non-profit organization can get a .org domain, and are more reliable than .com domains.
Researchers beware of the bias found in .org domains! How recent is the information?
How recently has the website been updated?
Is it current enough for your topic? Who is the creator or author?
What are their credentials?
Who is the publisher or sponsor?
Are they reputable?
What is the publisher's interest (if any) in this information?
Are there advertisements on the website? What kind of information is included in the resource?
Is the content of the resource primarily opinion? Is the opinion balanced?
Does the creator provide references or resources for data or quotations? C - Currency
A - Authority
R - Reliability
P - Purpose/Point of View Purpose/Point of View Is this fact or opinion?
Is the creator/author trying to sell you something?
Is it biased? “Every man should have a built-in automatic "carp" detector operating inside him.” - Ernest Hemingway I've evaluated my sources. Now what?
Full transcript