Two Concepts of Social Capital: Bourdieu vs. Putnam
SOCIAL CAPITAL
PUTNAM'S
Bordieu's
FORMS OF SOCIAL CAPITAL:
- Trust
- Micro-level and macro-level trust
- Associations as sources of trust
- increase the potential costs to a defector in any individual transaction
- Foster robust norms of reciprocity.
- Facilitate communications and improve the flow of information about the trustworthiness of individuals
- Social norms and obligations
- Social networks of citizens activity.
- Habitus
- Society as a plurality of social fields
- FORMS OF CAPITAL:
- Economic capital
- Cultural capital
- three forms of existence
- Social capital
- Division of the work of domination
- Organizational efectiveness
- Two components of social capital:
- group membership and social networkls
- symbolic character
- Objective and subjective structures
- Universal values
- "Sociodicy"
PATH DEPENDENCE: where you can get to depends on where you are coming from, and some destinations you simply cannot get to from here.
- "Brave Reciprocity"
- Trust creates reciprocity and voluntary associations, reciprocity and associations strengthen and produce trust.
- Vicious circles and virtuous circles
- Social trust in complex, postmodern comes from two related sources: norms of reciprocity and networks of civic engagement.
- Sports clubs and cultural associations as voluntary associations of "making democracy work"
- Three kinds of conflicts.
- Voluntary associations and social integration
- Activity of voluntary associations
- Societal consensus based on value compromises.
- Preconditions for the development of social capital:
- examination of co-effects of macro-structures
- putting an end to developments.