Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

Prigg vs. Pennsylvania

No description
by

itzel vela

on 18 May 2013

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Prigg vs. Pennsylvania

Research Analysis Prigg v. Pennsylvania Itzel Vela
5th Block
19 December 2012 In 1832 Margret Morgan, a slave, fleed from her owner, Margret Ashmore, in Maryland to go to Pennsylvania.

In 1837 Ashmore hires Edward Prigg to bring her slave back.

Prigg going against Pennsylvania law and seizes Morgan and her children and goes back to Maryland. Research cont. Prigg knew his actions were constitutional.

Pennsylvania state police arrested Prigg and charged him with kidnapping.

Pennsylvania law was unconstitutional. 1842 Research cont. Prigg pleaded to the Supreme Court.

He knew that they would rule in favor with him.

Justice Joseph Story argued the national government was forced by the the Constitution to return runaway slaves. Laws in Place The U.S. Constitution, Article IV Section 2 - escaped slaves must be returned to their rightful owners.
Pennsylvania law of 1826- It is a felony to kidnap and detain someone without going through proper procedure.
In 1793 Congress passed the first Fugitive Slave Act. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Edward Prigg.

In a 8-1 vote, the court reversed his conviction.

Northern free states fought back.
"Fugitive Slave Acts (1793, 1850)." Major Acts of Congress. Ed. Brian K. Landsberg. Vol. 2. Gale Cengage, 2004. eNotes.com. 18 Dec, 2012
“Prigg v. Pennsylvania: Slavery, The Supreme Court, and the Ambivalent Constitution.”, Student Research Center, 01 September 2012. Web. 23 October 2012
“Prigg v. Pennsylvania (1842)”, Credo reference, 2007. Web. 23 October 2012
“Prigg v. Pennsylvania (1842)”, Gale Opposing Viewpoints, 2011. Web. 23 October 2012
“U.S. Supreme Court”, FindLaw. Web. 23 October 2012
“Prigg v. Pennsylvania (1842)”, Black Past, 2007-2011, Web. 23 October 2012
“Prigg v. Pennsylvania” Gale Encyclopedia of American Law. 2010. Web. 23 October 2012. Works Cited Analysis cont. The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850
The Division on the Issue of Slavery
The Civil War Invention In the mind of a Justice, that was against slavery.
How she felt in court, and how she felt on the subject of slavery.
Full transcript