Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM


Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.


Emotional Resilience

No description

Karen Julien

on 4 February 2015

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Emotional Resilience

What is Resilience?
Case Study Activity:
Identifying Protective and Risk Factors
Case 1: Adam

Case 2: Fran
Protective and Risk Factors
Protective Factor
: A predictor of better outcomes particularly in situations of risk or adversity (Goldstein & Brooks, 2005).

Risk Factor:
A measurable characteristic in a group of individuals or their situation that predicts a negative outcome on a specific outcome criteria (Goldstein & Brooks, 2005).

Risk and Protective Factors of Resilience in Children and Youth
Select Factors
Taking a closer look at a few of the factors that contribute to resilience will highlight the complex nature of resilience, as a result of the numerous intervening variables contributing to its development.

Two of the factors that will be examined more closely include:
1. Executive functioning
2. Self-efficacy

Both of these factors are examples of protective/risk factors under the broad category of “child characteristics” .

What are Executive Functions?
Executive Functions are cognitive control mechanisms:

working memory

inhibition and self-control

cognitive flexibility

maintaining and shifting attention

maintain goal-directed behaviour

Resilience in Educational Settings
Teaching through storybooks
Self Evaluation of Resilience
Ahern, N. R., Ark, P., & Byers, J. (2008). Resilience and coping strategies in adolescents. Pediatric
Nursing, 20
(10), 32-36.

Diamond, A. (2012). Activities and programs that improve children's executive functions.
Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21
(5), 335-341.

Duckworth, A. & Seligman, M. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents.
Psychological Science, 16
(12), 939-944.

Goldstein, S., & Brooks, R. B. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of resilience in children. New York: Springer.

Masten, A. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development.
American Psychologist, 56
(3), 227-238.

McMillan, J. H., & Reed, D. F. (1994). At-risk students and resiliency: Factors Contributing to Academic Success. The Clearing House, 67(3), 137 – 140.

Rak, C. F. (2002). Heroes in the nursery: Three case studies in resilience. Journal of clinical psychology, 58(3), 247-260.

Saarni, C. (1999). The development of emotional competence. New York: Guildford Press.

Speight, N. P. (2009). The relationship between self-efficacy, resilience and academic achievement among African-American Urban Adolescent Students. Published Thesis. Retrieved from: http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3380333

Wenzel, A., Gunnar, M., and Masten, A. (2013). Protective role of executive function skills in high-risk environment. In R. Trembley, M. Boivin & Peters, R. (eds.)
Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development
[online]. Retrieved from: www.child-encyclopedia.com/documents/Wenzel-GunnarANGxp1-Resilience.pdf
Who Am I?
Using your mobile device, please respond to the questions to follow as per the instructions below:
By the end of this session we hope you will:

Recognize protective factors and risk factors as they relate to resilience
Appreciate the complex nature of interactions in resilience theory and research
Apply resilience concepts to educational settings
Assess your own resilience and protective factors
Illustration created from Masten (2001)
How do we study resilience?
Social Cognitive Theory and Ecological Systems Theory

Looking at the factors supporting or threatening resilience in individuals including their
own characteristics
and their
interactions within their social networks and the wider society
Executive Functions and Resilience
EF skills are more important than academic intelligence for school success (Duckworth & Seligman, 2005).

Teachers may (unknowingly?) value behavioural self-control (or its results) over intelligence in determining grades

EF skills are at risk in students exposed to high levels of adversity (Wenzel & Gunnar, 2013)

But...EF skills are also protective for high-risk children

EF skills appear to be responsive to intervention
Risk Factors:

Low self esteem or depression
External locus of control
Poor impulse control
Negative attitudes
Family Structure
Parent-Child Interaction

The individuals represented by each of the questions in our ‘Who am I?’ poll illustrate the wide spread of domains in which human beings can demonstrate resilience.

In Kaplan’s (2013) reconceptualization of the concept of resilience, he references recent studies that highlight the fact that
individuals may vary in adjustment depending upon the domain under consideration
. This has several implications for the conceptualization of resilience, and ultimately begs the question of whether resilience research should be defined in some overall criterion or in terms of particular context-specific favourable outcomes.

Consider this debate within resilience
research as we proceed to explore
the concept of resilience.

and Karen

Studies Investigate

Correlates of resilience

Longitudinal correlates and possible causation

Interventions to improve resilience

Complex systems involved in resilience
Protective Factors:

Strong cultural identity
Access to health care
Stable housing
Economic stability–ability to earn a livable wage
Social support–connections to family and friends
Affiliation with a supportive religious or faith community
Positive view of self
1. Which specific teaching practices do you think help contribute to resilience?

2. What components to her classroom help to make her teaching successful?

3. What challenges (if any) can you see with an activity such as this? What other factors might hinder the success in developing resilience?

Self-Efficacy and Resilience
people’s beliefs about their capabilities to exercise control over their own level of functioning and over events that affect their lives.

Self-efficacy beliefs are
informed through four sources
of efficacy information:
Mastery experience
Vicarious experiences
Verbal persuasion
Physiological and emotional arousal

Self-efficacy exerts its
influence through four major processes
Selection processes
(Bandura, 1986)

Saarni (1999) notes that the greater degree of internal resources and self-efficacy beliefs available to adolescents, the more comprehensive their coping mechanisms will be. Therefore, self-efficacy may play a key role in the ability to cope and persist with difficult situations in resilient youth.

This theorizing has been demonstrated in empirical literature:
Self-efficacy and resilience
‘Profile of a resilient student’, McMillan and Reed (1994)
Speight (2009), explored the contributory effect of select demographic variables (i.e. authoritative parenting, role models, and SES) on the variance in self-efficacy and resilience. Results of her study indicated that resilience was significantly and positively correlated with self-efficacy:

Self-efficacy = beneficial to one’s coping ability = beneficial to one’s resilience

In examining the implications of self-efficacy during childhood and adolescents for teachers and parents, Pajares (2005) notes that we should ensure that student’s interpretations of their successes and failures are adaptive, as mastery experiences are a major contributor to one’s self-efficacy (Bandura, 1986).

One Roman poet Virgil wrote that “they are able who think they are able.”

One important characteristic of successful individuals, as we saw in our celebrity “Who am I?” game, is that failure and adversity do not undermine their self-efficacy beliefs.

So What?
“It is the meaning of our experiences which constitutes reality” – Alfred Schutz

How might teachers put this quote into action in their teaching practices?

“When failure is normative, resilience is second nature” (Pajares, 2005, p. 345)

Often, all that is needed is an adaptive perspective on failure. After Thomas Edison made an estimated 1, 000 unsuccessful attempts at inventing the light bulb, a reporter asked, “how did it feel to fail 1,000 times?” Edison replied, “I didn’t fail 1,000 times. The light bulb was an invention with 1,000 steps.
Correlates of
Developmental Systems Approach
Multiple-systems levels
First Wave
Identifying individual resilience and factors that make a difference:
yielded good descriptions of resilience phenomena
developed basic concepts and methodologies
focused on the individual
Second Wave
Embedding resilience in developmental and ecological systems, with a focus on process:
yielded a more dynamic accounting of resilience
adopted a developmental systems approach to theory and research on positive adaptation in the context of adversity or risk
focused on transactions among individuals and the many systems in which their development is embedded
Third Wave
Intervening to foster resilience:
focused on creating resilience by intervention directed at changing developmental pathways
Fourth Wave
Resilience research on multiple-systems levels, epigenetic processes, and neurobiological processes:
focused on understanding and integrating resilience across multiple levels of analysis
growing attention to epigenetic and neurobiological processes, brain development, and the ways that systems interact to shape development.
The History of and New Directions for Resilience Research
The scientific study of resilience emerged around 1970 when a group of pioneering researchers began to notice the phenomenon of positive adaptation among subgroups of children who were considered “at risk” for developing later psychopathy.
Full transcript