Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM


Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.


Workshop - MGTS1601

No description

Rita De Cássia Roes

on 15 April 2013

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Workshop - MGTS1601

Perception and Individual Decision Making What is
perception? Shortcuts to judging others give meaning The world that is perceived Perception of what reality is, not reality itself. Factors that shape and distort perception: Situation Target Perceiver Decision Making Biases Applications of Shortcutting Person perception refers to a general tendency to form impressions of other people How to make decisions Quality of choices Perception Awareness that a problem exists and whether a decision needs to be made is a perceptual issue! Every decision requires us to interpret and evaluate information. The decision maker’s process determines which data is relevant to the decision. perceptual distortions Process oriented approach Outcome oriented approach ? ? 1. pre-decision stage

2. final decision stage

3. post decision stage Selective Perception 83% of the sales executives rated sales as the most important problem in the case study that was given to them Stereotyping Judging someone on the basis of one’s perception of the group to which that person belongs. “And besides, you probably did what she said you did because you’re male and nobody would believe you anyway” Contrast Effect Same characteristics. prior poor context: good ratings
prior good context: poor ratings
context-free control: average ratings Halo Effect General impression Reponses with high positive halo were the fastest ones. It shows that they used a single impression to make multiple decisions. Which shortcut is it? Overconfidence bias: overly optimistic in their responses. Anchoring bias example: used a lot by sales people -> the first thing they say is always the most important. Confirmation bias Availability bias Tendency for people to judge based on information that is readily available Hindsight bias Once a company knows the outcome, they believe they can accurately predict it again for next time. Job interviews Job interviewers decisons change very little after they have formed their first impressions of candidates. Performance expectations An individual’s behaviour is determined by others expectations of them Performance evaluation Appraisal How can individual decisions be biased by shortcuts to judging others? Individuals interpret impressions Behavior Behaviorally important. Decision making process: bias analysis and conclusions. Stages of decision making process: Interests Background experience Attitudes Comparisons Single characteristic. how often do you think people are right when they say 100% sure? first impressions dilemma information after the first impression is less important. We tend to put more emphasis on information that agrees with our beliefs or re-affirms past choices, and vice versa. Events that evoke emotion or are more vivid tend to be more available in our memory. This reduces the ability to learn from the past. Self fulfilling prophecy. Continuation of employment. Pay increases Promotion Halo Effect Selective Perception Stereotyping Contrast Effect

Augustine,Rebaccah K. (2001) "Thanks, Kiddo!": A survival guide for professional generation Xers, Organization Development Journal, 19(2): 19.

Becker, Geraldine A and Charles E Miller. (2002) Examining contrast effects in performance appraisals: Using appropriate controls and assessing accuracy,

The Journal of Psychology, 136(6): 667.

Beyer, Janice M, Chattopadhyay, Prithviraj George, Elizabeth Glick, William H et al. (1997) The selective perception of managers revisited, Academy of

Management Journal, 40(3):716-737.

Boyle, Brett A Dahlstrom Robert F and James J Kellaris. (1998) Points of reference and individual differences as sources of bias in ethical judgements,

Journal of Business Ethics, 17(5): 517.

Fischhoff, Baruch, Solcis, Paul, Lichtenstein, Sarah, (1997) Knowing With Certainty: The Appropriateness of Extreme Confidence, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3(4) 552-564.

Hammond, John, Keeney, Ralph, Raiffa, Howard (1999) Smart Choices: A Practical Guide to Making Better Decisions, Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis 8 (1): 57

Lyons Wendy (2006) Ability Testing, The British Journal of Administrative

Management, Jun/Jul.: 23.

Nickerson, Raymond, (1998) Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises, Review of General Psychology 2(2):175-220

Palmer, Jerry K and James M Loveland. (2008) The Influence of Group Discussion on Performance Judgments: Rating Accuracy, Contrast Effects, and Halo Effect,

The Journal of Psychology, 142(2): 117.

Robbins, Judge, Millett, Boyle (2011) Organisational Behaviour, Pearson Australia: Sydney

Stone, Kerri Lynn (2010-2011) Clarifying Stereotyping, p.595

Thompson, Deborah V., Rebecca W., Hamilton, and Petia K. Petrova, (2012) The Effects of Outcome versus Process-Oriented Thinking on Decision Difficulty, in preparation for 2nd round review, The Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth.

Tversky, A, Kahneman, D (1973) Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, Cognitive Psychology, 5(2): 207-232.

Waller, Mary J, Huber, George P, Glick, William H. (1995) Functional background as a determinant of executives' selective perception, Academy of Management

Journal, 38(4): 943.

Werth, Lioba, Strack, Fritz, Forster, Jens, (2002) Certainty and Uncertainty: The Two Faces of Hindsight Bias, Organizational Behaviour and Decision Processes, 87 (2) 323-341.

Zysberg, Leehu and Baruch Nevo. (2004) "The Smarts That Counts?",
Psychologists' Decision-Making in PersonnelSelection, Journal of Business and Psychology,19(1): 117. Reference List
Full transcript