Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Media Coverage in Hurricaine Katrina
Transcript of Media Coverage in Hurricaine Katrina
- CNN filed a lawsuit and obtained a temporary restraining order against the federal ban that stated that all journalists would have 'zero' access to the rescue efforts of victims.
- Brian Barker, KATU journalist, reported that his team was threatened with automatic weapons by U.S Marshals.
- Lucas Oleniuk, Toronto Star staff, was thrown to the ground by the police after taking several photograps including a firefight between looters and police including an alledged beating of said looter.
- Marko Georgiev was threatened with weapons and had his memory card confiscated after taking photos of a body presumably shot by a police
There was a lot of friction between the truth-seeking journalists and the U.S. Military that took over the rescue efforts in September. This caused much restriction in what the journalists were able to publish... Many representatives of the news media became directly involved with the events that occurred. Due to the loss of communication, (Land-based and cellular telephones for example) the reporters became one of the most important methods of communication between the victims and the authorities.
Located groups of stranded victims and reported their location (via Satellite link)
At one stage all newspaper coverage was carried on NOLA blogs which were monitered constantly by rescue teams and anxious families looking for signs of missing loved ones.
Naturally there are many different opinions on this idea. To Tom Rostensiel, who is a journalist, it is "an in invitation to Chaos".
Censoring Reasoning behind this is simple, they wanted to 'respect' the deceased and avoid upsetting several citizens further.
FEMA reported that "the recovery of victims is being treated with dignity and upmost respect we requested not to have any photographs of the deceased be made by the media.
The media in hurricane Katrina were told to censore their photographs and videos, not allowing any pictures of the deceased to public. By refusing to show images of the reality of the situation, the media left out a main part of the disaster and possibly gave the public a different impression of the situation in heavily-hit areas. "It's impossible for me to imagine how you report a story whose subject is death without allowing the public to see images of the subject of the story," said Larry Siems of the PEN American Center "You cannot report on the disaster and give the public a realistic idea of how horrible it is if you don't see that there are bodies as well." "Let's not make a common-decency issue into a censorship issue," Tapscott said. "Nobody wants to wake up in the morning and see their dead uncle on the front page. That's just common decency."
Refuses hundreds of personelle, dozens of vehicles
Wont let Red Cross deliver food
Fails to utilize Navy ship (with 600 bed hospital)
Wont accept Amtracks Help
Turns back Wall-Mart Supply trucks
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-050902daley,1,2011979.story http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05246/565143.stm http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0509040369sep04,1,4144825.story http://news.ft.com/cms/s/84aa35cc-1da8-11da-b40b-00000e http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/05/national/nationalspecial/05blame.html Cover up? Its clear that there were many aspects of the rescue efforts that were less than satisfactory but some of the facts are unbeleivable yet little to no stories have gone on the main media. Does this suggest signs of a cover up? Many reporters became very emotionally involved with the situation and numerous cases of rumours about the situation at the convention center where the refugees were kept, for example, were widespread and very terrifying. However the reliability of these rumours are uncertain due to lack of evidence and contradicting statements from the authorities While there were many cases of reported 'looting' during the crisis, there were also more serious reports of rape, murder and 'lawlessness' among the victims. One reporter, Geraldo Rivera, tearfully pleaded authorities to send help or let people leave and compared the convention center (where the victims were kept) to ' Willowbrook State School'.
There were many people who backed up these theories including local police and several reporters but there were also many who went against these claims, interporating these rumours as 'yellow journalism' In this case, Yellow Journalism is wher journalists uses exaggeration of non-existant events and inaccurate news coupled with eye-catching headlines to sell newspapers. With so many contradictory arguments on both sides and an unsurprising lack of evidence (since the reporters were not permitted in certain areas) it is very unclear what actually happened in the convention center during those critical times... AP - Associated Press
A young man walks though chest deep flood water after LOOTING a grocery store in New Orleans on Tuesday, Aug 30, 2005. Flood waters continue to rise in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina did extensive damage when it... AFP - Agence France Presse
Two residents wade through chest-deep water after finding bread and soda from a local grocery store after Hurricane Katrina came through the area in New Orleans, Louisianna (AFP/ Getty Images/ Chris Graythen) There were many reports of the levees, holding the water from the misssissippi river back, being broken before the hurricane hit, causing damage to the black community living in New Orleans.
From bombs to Cold War Weapons to suspicious barges in the industrial Canal, there are many theories for this happening but the question is, where are the articles on this event?
For the barge theory, one story was found but it has been "scrubbed" from the main Minneapolis Star Tribune website and replaced with a totally different story. A change of Heart or is this slightly supicious? During the initial news coverage, some media outlets tried to explain away the time discrepancy as a "secondary storm surge" off of Lake Pontchartrain. Hurricanes DO NOT create "secondary storm surges" only one main one.