Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Flat vs. Tall Structures
Transcript of Flat vs. Tall Structures
Nike, Growth Company
2. Tall structures
3. Flat structures
4. Nike, an example case of a Flat Structure Organization
5. Final conclusions
4. Nike: Example of a Flat Structure
Purpose of the project:
- Illustrate and explain Tall and Flat Structures
-Compare both Organizational Structures
-Brief Definition of Flat Structure
-Nike, an example of a Flat Structure
-Optimization when solving Problems
-Delay in Approving the Execution of Actions
-Low Decision Power of Managers
-Lack of Communication Between Groups
-Clear Chain of Commands
-Too much work for one manager
-Less quality of performance
More Efficient and Innovative than
2.Take advantage of:
Satisfaction and Growth
3. As Nike example: Global competition needs
to the market place dynamics.
.Multinational company Created in
by Bill Bowerman and Philip Knight.
.Nike main competitive advantage is
allows it to take faster decisions: Nike’s successful strategy is mainly the completely well positioning of its employees to address transitions.
"Quick but Wise Decisions"
.Nike is Composed by a Total of
around the world.
located at the U.S
are distributed within
Nike Golf, Cole Haan Holdings Inc., Bauer Nike Hockey Inc., Exeter Brands Groups, Hurley International LC and Converse Inc..
strong organizational society
for the whole group: ‘Regional Headquarters’ for the EMEA.
Responsibilities of being on the
top of the hierarchical decision-making pyramid
. Take the role of Regional Headquarters for Pacific Asia, U.S.A and the Americas.