Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
The Mozart Effect
Transcript of The Mozart Effect
-The "Mozart Effect" refers to the specific claim that listening to Mozart's Sonata for Two Pianos in D Major, K.448 can improve the performance in spatio-temporal tasks
The Mozart Effect
- 34 participants took part in the study
- 13 males
- 21 females
- All were students from Oxford university
- mean age of 20
- 31 right handed, 2 left handed, 1 ambidextrous
- Questionnaire was used to record personal info
(age, handedness, musical knowledge/ability)
Detection of the second target (T2) was
significantly more accurate when played normally
Suggests temporal component to the
Comparisons between all 5 lags:
p < .006
Comparison between lags 4 and 5:
p = .759
Comparison between playing forwards vs. backwards
p = .048
Playing regularly vs. silent condition
p = .027
Knowledge/expertise had no
effect on performance
-First reported by Rauscher et al.
-Many researchers were unable to replicate Rauscher et al.'s findings and similar results could not be produced with composers similar to Mozart
-Those findings that do support the "Mozart Effect" have been between-subjects experimental designs
-Olivers and Nieuwenhuis reported that attentional blink (a unimodal visual temporal task) were completely eliminated when participants listened to a continuous beating tune as compared to a silent baseline
-Attentional blink (AB) refers to people's inability to detect the second of two targets presented in close succession
-AB typically lasts for 400 ms in normal participants
-AB that lasts much longer can be a sign of unilateral visual neglect
-It is important to note that Olivers and Nieuwenhuis's study was based on a between-subjects design
- The study consisted of 20 practice trials, followed by 3 blocks of 100 trials
-Block 1: K.448 Forward
-Block 2: K.448 Reverse
-Block 3: Silent
- Used E-Prime Software to present distractor letters and target among two target digits.
- I, O, Q, & S were omitted to avoid confusion with 1, 0, and 5.
- 2 through 9 were used as target digits
Mean T1 and T2 detection accuracy as a
function of Condition and Lag.
Error bars indicate the standard
errors of the means
- There was only statistical improvement in T2 identification when music was played normally.
- Possible explanation being an overall change in arousal modulated cognitive performance.
...instead of Mozart having a short-term effect on temporal processing.
- This explanation leads to further argument that listening to forward Mozart sonata leads to a more optimal level of arousal, allowing for selective attention.
- An increase in arousal from standard should show facilitation of T1 at any lag.
However, we don't see this.
- Separate study tested Mozart's Sonata
for Two Pianos vs. Bach's Goldberg Variations
To test for similar enhancement in temporal processing.
- Looking at T2 accuracy,
show results similar to overall,
show no statistical change and seem to perform at ceiling.
- Failed to show any statistical effect from listening to a different composer or another Mozart piece.
- Listening to Mozart's Sonata (forward) seems to only induce an arousal or mood change.
-Other studies have been conducted showing that mood changes do influence cognitive performance.
e.g. memorizing stimuli