Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

Action Research Project

No description
by

Mirv Kadd

on 20 September 2013

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Action Research Project

Discussion
Professional Research Project

Origins of Reciprocal Teaching
Methodology
What does the literature say?
Results - Pretest
Do the reciprocal reading strategies 'predictor', 'questioner', 'clarifier' and 'summariser' improve Year 1 reading comprehension?
Reciprocal Teaching To Improve Reading Comprehension
Proposal
Class Context
Year 1
21 students (10 girls, 11 boys)
All students from LBOTE
4 new arrivals
School Context
South-West Sydney
K-6 government school
Low socio-economic area
Approx. 580 students
40 different cultural
backgrounds
98% LBOTE
30% refugee population
Rationale
comprehension needed in everyday life
A large emphasis has been placed on decoding text but not enough on comprehension. It is imperative that teachers teach students the comprehension strategies they need to succeed as future readers (Myers, 2005).
Develop self-monitoring strategies
(Meyers, 2005)
Social support
(Cooper and Greive, 2009)
Improves listening skills
(Petty, 2009)
Promotes deeper understanding and higher-order thinking
(Almasi, 1995; Meyer, 2010)
Increases/improves peer dialogue
(Meyer, 2010)
Pro's
Week 7
Week 8
Week 9
What I think
Limitations
Implications
Future practice?
References
promote deeper understanding of books
become independent readers
develop self monitoring strategies
Con's
reading strategies not used before reciprocal teaching
post-test of reflection cards
Time constraints
Full schedule
Interruptions
Absent students
Year 1 students not too young to learn strategies
Asking clarifying questions is difficult
Too many strategies for such a short amount of time
Try puppets again but with sufficient time to implement RT
Introduce small group reading sessions
Almasi, J. F. (1995). The nature of fourth graders' sociocognitive conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussions of literature. Research Reading Quarterly, 30 (3), 314-351.
McLaughlin, M., & Allen, M. B. (2009). Guided comprehension in grades 3-8 (2nded.).Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Myers, P.A. (2005). The princess storyteller, clara clarifier, quincy questioner, and the wizard: reciprocal teaching adapted for kindergarten students. The Reading Teacher, 59 (4), pp 314-324.
Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L (1984).Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities.Cognition &Instruction, 1(2), 117- 175.
Petty, G. (2009). Evidence-based teaching – A practical approach. United Kingdom: Nelson Thornes Pty.
Pilonicta, P., & Medina, A. L. (2009). Reciprocal teaching for the primary grades: 'We can do it, too!' Reading Teacher, 63(2), 120-129.
Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64(4), 479-530.

Puppets a good strategy to engage students, particularly those learning English as a second language.

Some students benefited from the intervention

Students need further development in clarifying questions

Findings are not very reliable
summary of book using bullet points
Vygotsky's 'zone of proximal development' (1978)
Week 1: Becoming familiar with the class
Week 2: Pre-test reflection cards
Week 3: Predicting puppet
Weeks 4-5: Pre-test and Questioning puppet
Week 6: Clarifying puppet and post-test
Week 7: Pre-test and Summarising puppet
Week 8: Post-test and Summarising activity.
Week 9: Post-test reflection cards


Weeks 4-6
Quantitative Data
The rubrics will show how students have scored, the frequency, and if any improvements have been made (i.e. increase in score)
Qualitative data
Student reflections will strengthen the connection between what i have observed and the effectiveness of RT.
Full transcript