Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Transcript of 1994
ABVA Petition filed in Delhi High Court
Naz Foundation Petition filed in Delhi High Court
JACK Intervention filed on ground that law is required to prevent HIV from spreading
Government of India affidavit ( Ministry of Home Affairs) supporting retention of law on grounds that criminal law must reflect public morality and that Indian society disapproved of homosexuality
Delhi High Court dismissed petition on the ground that the petitioner, Naz Foundation was not affected by Sec 377 and hence had no 'locus standi' to challenge the law.
Delhi High Court rejected a review petition filed which challenged the previous order
On an appeal filed by Naz Foundation, the Supreme Court passed an order remanding the case back to the Delhi High Court so the matter could be heard on merits
National Aids Control Organization(NACO) filed an affidavit stating that the enforcement of Sec 377 is a hindrance to HIV prevention efforts.
An intervention was filed by B.P. Singhal stating that homosexuality is against Indian culture and that the law needs to be retained.
The matter was posted for final arguments before C.J. Shah and J. Muralidhar
An intervention was filed by Voices Against 377 supporting the petitioner and stating that Sec 377 is violative of the fundamental rights of LGBT persons. .
Judgment in Naz Foundation v. NCR Delhi delivered
The matter was reserved for judgment after 12 days of hearing
First SLP filed in the Supreme Court by Suresh Kumar Koushal challenging the Naz Foundation judgement
2009 - 2011
Fifteen other SLP's are filed challenging the Naz Foundation judgment by
Apostolic Churches Allicance tr its Bishop v. Naz Foundation & Ors
SK Tijarawala v. Naz Foundation & Ors.
Bhim Singh v. Naz Foundation & Ors
B. Krishna Bhat v. Naz Foundation & Ors.
B.P. Singhal v. Naz Foundation & Ors.
S.D. Pratinidhi Sabha & Anr. v. Naz Foundation & Ors.
Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights v. Naz Foundation & Ors.
Ram Murti v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
Krantikari Manuvadi Morcha Party v. Naz Foundation & Others
Raza Academy v. Naz Foundation & Others
Tamil Nadu Muslim Munnetra Kazhagam v. Naz Foundation & Others.
Utkal Christian Council v. Naz Foundation & Others
Joint Action Kannur v. Naz Foundation and Others
All India Muslim Personal Law Board v. Naz Foundation and Others
Trust Gods Ministry vs. Naz Foundation and Others
2009 - 2011
Interventions filed supporting the Naz judgement by
Minna Saran and 18 other parents of LGBT person
Sekhar Seshadri and12 other mental health professionals
Nivedita Menon and fifteen other academics
Ratna Kapur and other law academics
Final Arguments before the Supreme Court commence
Case reserved for judgment after 15 days of arguments over 6 weeks
Justice Singvi retires