Introducing 

Prezi AI.

Your new presentation assistant.

Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.

Loading content…
Transcript

Total between politics and religion is that both these areas are

the regulation of relations and relationships between people, their union, or

separation. But more significant and profound differences between them. Very important in

This comparison of the following point: if the policy is based on violence, the religion

Violence has historically evaluated differently.

In the ancient world and the Middle Ages

national religions usually openly disapproved of the use of violence

with respect to co-religionists or his political opponents. Currently

polavlyayuschee time most of the national representatives of the world religions

religions usually condemn violence in all its forms.

The Republic of Kazakhstan is a prime example of international and country

interfaith harmony. Fundamentals of multi-confessional state

laid down by the legislation in the first years of the independent republic. AT

Under the Constitution of Kazakhstan is a secular state. Article 19

Of the Constitution states: "Everyone has the right to determine and

indicate or not to indicate his

national, party and religious affiliation "[1, p.4]. Article 22

proclaims: "Everyone has the right to freedom of conscience" [1, p.4]. In Kazakhstan

guaranteed freedom of religion and the separation of religion and proclaimed

state.

Politics and religion

Religious hostility was mostly confined to a few troubled regions where people with differing religious faiths shared the same area of land. Religious differences often fueled bitter power struggles for political control of the land, which occasionally erupted into violence and bloodshed

By Aruzhan Turar

Establishment and Separation of Church and State

A church may be supported through taxes and subject to the direction of the government (for example, the monarch is still officially the head of the Church of England, and the Prime Minister is responsible for selecting the Archbishop of Canterbury).

Particular ecclesiastical officials may have, in virtue of their office, an established role in political institutions.

A church may simply have a privileged role in certain public, political ceremonies (for example, inaugurations, opening of parliament, etc.).

Instead of privileging a particular religious group, a state could simply enshrine a particular creed or belief system.

The relation between religion and politics continues to be an important theme in political philosophy, despite the emergent consensus (both among political theorists and in practical political contexts, such as the United Nations) on the right to freedom of conscience and on the need for some sort of separation between church and state.

One reason for the importance of this topic is that religions often make strong claims on people’s allegiance, and universal religions make these claims on all people, rather than just a particular community. For example, Islam has traditionally held that all people owe obedience to Allah’s will. Thus, it is probably inevitable that religious commitments will sometimes come into conflict with the demands of politics. But religious beliefs and practices also potentially support politics in many ways. The extent and form of this support is as important to political philosophers as is the possibility for conflict. Moreover, there has been a growing interest in minority groups and the political rights and entitlements they are due. One result of this interest is substantial attention given to the particular concerns and needs of minority groups who are distinguished by their religion, as opposed to ethnicity, gender, or wealth.

Learn more about creating dynamic, engaging presentations with Prezi