Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
Terry Eagleton-Criticism and Idealogy
Leon Trotsky- Literature and Revolution - writer should be engineers of human souls
Lucien Goldman- showed how economics determine mental structures of social groups- literary works are collectve products of trans-individual mental structures
Developed theory that "historical materialism" and economic forces were the driving force of human endeavor
He perceived history as a series of class struggles where the alienation of the worker in industrial capitalist societies resulted in class warfare which was then reflected in the arts
The Proletariat revolution would eventually create a new social an economic order capable of creating great art
Base vs. Superstructure Model-
Economics forms the base of society including class interaction and power hierarchies- society always want to regenerate base
Superstructure consists of law, politics, philosophy, religion and art which grow out of society's base
Literature is a product of work in itself and it does identifiable work of its own- Marxist Criticism "shows the text as it cannot know itself as a product of the conditions of its making of which it is necessarily silent"(Eagleton)
He Influenced 'western Marxism' as a 'humanist' alternative to Stalinist theories- most liberal Marxist. His theory of reification views the nature of all relationships through the relationships between traded objects. Class is the result of an economic oppression.
Europe, in creating a working class, created a monster.
In Frankenstein, Shelly compares the Monster to the Proletariat and Victor Frankenstein to the Bourgeoisie/Ruling Class
"It bears witness to the birth of a monster, simultaneously the object of pity and fear, the industrial working class."
Science and Technology are "alienating and dehumanizing" that "turns humans into a lower form of life."
"Technology and science, so centered to novel, are..." "Utterly absent from the work"
-There are frequent mentions of beautiful scenery and gorgeous landscapes but none of the industrial world or workforce.
The monster is the "sole embodiment" of industry in a completely rural world, which makes him seem even more monstrous and foreign
The monster is more of a "product rather than a creation" who was assembled more by science and technology, than by a man. (Lecourt)
- Pity the monster: The workforce is poor, struggling for survival and rights, and attempting to find a place in society
- Fear the monster: possesses great power, "a monster that, once unleashed, could not be controlled"Initially, rational, but irrationality later presents itself
The Monster was made up of "parts of many people" and lacks "unity of a natural organisms"
......Sounds like a Revolution
The "Workshop of Filthy Creation": A Marxist Reading of Frankenstien
-These social experiments were initially successful, but ended up as failures.
Literary works are not "autonomous artifacts" they are
"Incontestably interwoven in this history"
Marxist criticism serves to restore the literary dependency of a work.
"When we say that literary works are historical by their very nature we mean that we do not leave the work in search of its historical meaning but seek the meaning of its historical existence."
-This technology resulted in increased unemployment, a decrease in wages, and an increase in consumer goods and food
Hegemony- power of dominant ideology to perpetuate itself through literature